It seems that you are looking for assistance in categorizing sources into "Reliable Sources" and "Non-Reliable Sources." While I cannot see the specific examples you have, I can provide guidance on what typically qualifies as a reliable or non-reliable source.
Reliable Sources
- Peer-reviewed journals
- Books published by reputable publishers
- Government publications
- University websites
- Reputable news organizations (e.g., BBC, The New York Times)
- Academic conferences and papers
- Established non-profit organizations
Non-Reliable Sources
- Personal blogs or opinion pieces
- Social media posts without credible backing
- Websites with no clear authorship (e.g., Wikipedia entries without references)
- Conspiracy theory websites
- Sensationalist or tabloid news sources
- User-generated content (e.g., forums)
If you have specific examples that you would like to categorize, please list them, and I can help determine where they might fall in these categories.