Question
Simplify. Express your answer as a single term using exponents. HINT: When multiplying you must have the same base and add the exponents. (1 point) 1785 ×1789 = ?
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To simplify the expression \(1785 \times 1789\) as a single term using exponents, we can rewrite the numbers in terms of their bases if possible.
However, there seems to be a misunderstanding, as \(1785\) and \(1789\) cannot be expressed as the same base directly for multiplication. If we need to keep it as a multiplication of two distinct bases, we cannot combine them with exponents.
But if we look at \(1785\) and \(1789\) more closely, we can express them in terms of \(1785\):
\[
1789 = 1785 + 4
\]
Thus, we can't turn it into a single exponential term.
So, we need to present the operation as is:
\[
1785 \times 1789
\]
If you're looking for simply the mathematical product, we can state that it equals:
\[
1785 \times 1789 = 3,195,765
\]
But in terms of exponents, without common bases, the expression remains:
\[
1785 \times 1789
\]
If you seek a specific format or manipulation, please clarify!
However, there seems to be a misunderstanding, as \(1785\) and \(1789\) cannot be expressed as the same base directly for multiplication. If we need to keep it as a multiplication of two distinct bases, we cannot combine them with exponents.
But if we look at \(1785\) and \(1789\) more closely, we can express them in terms of \(1785\):
\[
1789 = 1785 + 4
\]
Thus, we can't turn it into a single exponential term.
So, we need to present the operation as is:
\[
1785 \times 1789
\]
If you're looking for simply the mathematical product, we can state that it equals:
\[
1785 \times 1789 = 3,195,765
\]
But in terms of exponents, without common bases, the expression remains:
\[
1785 \times 1789
\]
If you seek a specific format or manipulation, please clarify!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.