To rewrite \(\log(1343)\) and \(\log(1/343)\) using the properties of logarithms, we can apply the Power Rule of Logarithms.
The Power Rule states that \(\log(a^b) = b \cdot \log(a)\).
Let's analyze \(\log(1343)\) and \(\log(1/343)\):
-
Logarithm of \( 1/343 \): \[ \log\left(\frac{1}{343}\right) = \log(343^{-1}) = -\log(343) \]
-
Next, we note that \(343\) is \(7^3\): \[ \log(343) = \log(7^3) = 3 \cdot \log(7) \]
So: \[ \log\left(\frac{1}{343}\right) = -\log(343) = -3 \cdot \log(7) \]
Now, we express everything together:
- \(\log(1343)\) is separate and is not transformed in this case as it is unrelated to the logarithm of \(343\).
From the responses given, the closest matching expression to \(-3 \cdot \log(7)\) is: \[ \mathbf{-3\log7} \]
Thus we can conclude: \[ \log(1343) + \log\left(\frac{1}{343}\right) = \log(1343) - 3 \log(7) \]
In the specific context of your question, we specifically needed to express \(\log(1/343)\), which we found to be: \[ \mathbf{-3\log7} \]