Question

Compare the world in "Examination Day" to our world. Do you see any similarities in how society controls individuals?

Answers

Answered by GPT-4o mini
"Examination Day" by Henry Slesar presents a dystopian society where the government exerts strict control over individuals through a mandated intelligence test administered to twelve-year-olds. The outcome of this test determines not only the child’s future but also their very existence; those who score above a certain threshold are deemed too intelligent and are consequently eliminated.

When comparing the world of "Examination Day" to our own, there are several striking similarities and differences in how society controls individuals:

### Similarities:

1. **Standardized Testing**: In our world, standardized testing plays a significant role in education, determining academic opportunities and career paths, similar to how the intelligence exam determines the fate of the children in Slesar's story. The pressure to perform well can create a culture of anxiety and conformity.

2. **Surveillance and Control**: Both societies exhibit a form of surveillance. In "Examination Day," the government monitors the children's intelligence to maintain a submissive population. In our world, various forms of surveillance—social media tracking, data collection by companies, and even government monitoring—can influence individual behavior and limit personal freedom.

3. **Conformity**: In Slesar’s world, the need to conform to societal expectations is evident in the way families prepare children for the examination, often repressing their natural abilities. Similarly, our world often values conformity, whether through social norms, workplace expectations, or educational systems that prioritize uniformity over individual creativity.

4. **Socioeconomic Disparities**: The control of individuals is often linked to socioeconomic status. In "Examination Day," the societal structure favors those who fit specific criteria, echoing how marginalized groups in our world can face systemic barriers that limit access to opportunities based on their background.

### Differences:

1. **Moral and Ethical Choices**: While "Examination Day" presents an extreme and outright lethal consequence of intelligence, our world, despite its challenges, allows for ethical discussions about intelligence, diversity, and creativity. There are avenues for advocacy, reform, and change that do not exist in Slesar's narrative.

2. **Freedom of Expression**: In most democratic societies today, there is a degree of freedom of speech and expression that allows individuals to challenge the status quo. In "Examination Day," dissent is not tolerated, and the society silences those who may question or resist the system.

3. **Diverse Definitions of Success**: While Slesar’s society defines intelligence in a narrow manner, our world recognizes multiple forms of intelligence and success, including emotional, artistic, and practical intelligence. People can carve out paths that do not rely solely on formal testing or government approval.

4. **Access to Information**: In our world, individuals generally have access to a wealth of information, which empowers them to question and educate themselves about societal structures. Conversely, the society in "Examination Day" is rigid and lacks transparency, limiting the knowledge that children have about their own potential.

### Conclusion:

While "Examination Day" serves as a cautionary tale of extreme societal control through intelligence testing, it reflects real-world issues related to conformity, surveillance, and the consequences of systemic inequities. However, the freedoms, diversity of thought, and avenues for change in our society present a counterbalance to the appalling control depicted in Slesar’s narrative, underscoring the importance of vigilance in protecting individual rights and fostering a more inclusive society.

Related Questions