In "Rise of Kingdoms," both Pyrrhus and Julius Caesar have their strengths, and which one is "better" can depend on your specific playstyle and the situation you are facing.
-
Julius Caesar:
- Role: Versatile and well-rounded commander.
- Strengths:
- He has skills that benefit both infantry and cavalry, making him a strong choice for a mixed troop composition.
- His skills provide buffs to troops and can deal significant damage, especially against certain troop types.
- He is often considered effective for both attacking and defending.
-
Pyrrhus:
- Role: Strong cavalry commander.
- Strengths:
- He offers specific bonuses to cavalry troops, making him a great choice if you are focusing on a cavalry-heavy strategy.
- His skills are more offensive-oriented, providing high damage output and the ability to counter specific troop types effectively.
Conclusion:
- If you are using a mixed army or need a commander who can adapt to various situations, Julius Caesar may be the better choice.
- If your strategy revolves around cavalry and maximizing their effectiveness in battle, Pyrrhus would likely serve you better.
Ultimately, the best commander will depend on your overall strategy, the composition of your armies, and the context of the battles you're engaging in. Consider your objectives, troop types, and personal playing style when choosing between the two.
1 answer