Let's analyze the relationships in the analogy you've provided:
The original analogy suggests a relationship between two pairs of words where one word describes a type of writing or communication that serves to explain something, while the other describes a type of writing or communication that aims to influence or convince an audience.
-
Explanatory: This term refers to something that clarifies or explains ideas or concepts. It is often associated with expository writing, which is designed to inform or explain.
-
Convincing: This term is associated with persuasion, where the goal is to persuade the audience to a certain viewpoint or action. Persuasive writing is designed specifically to convince.
Now, let's look at the options:
-
Persuasive, influential: This pairing doesn't fit because both terms relate to convincing rather than to explaining.
-
Expository, persuasive: This is the correct pairing because "expository" writing is explanatory in nature, while "persuasive" writing is intended to convince the audience.
-
Descriptive, defensive: This pairing is not relevant to the analogy because neither "descriptive" nor "defensive" aligns with the concepts of explaining or convincing in a direct manner.
-
Expository, descriptive: Both are types of writing, but "descriptive" does not have a direct relationship to convincing, making this pairing incorrect.
The reason "Expository, persuasive" is correct lies in the functional roles of each term. Expository writing aims to inform or explain (explanatory), while persuasive writing aims to convince (convincing).
Example:
-
Expository writing: A textbook explaining the process of photosynthesis. It aims to clarify how plants convert sunlight into energy.
-
Persuasive writing: An advertisement convincing consumers to buy a particular brand of solar panels by highlighting their efficiency and benefits.
Thus, the correct answer reflects the relationship between the two pairs accurately.