To arrive at a shared binomial in Step 3, Kevin should focus on grouping the terms in a way that common factors can be identified effectively. Let's analyze the options given:
-
A) Use different factors for −7x in Step 1.
This option suggests changing the way the middle term (−7x) is split, which could potentially lead to a shared binomial in Step 3. -
B) Use −2 as the GCF of the second grouping in Step 3.
This would not necessarily help since the grouping itself is already leading to a different structure (−2 would be factoring out from a group that is currently not leading to shared binomials). -
C) Use −3x as the GCF of the first grouping in Step 3.
This option wouldn't directly help in achieving a shared binomial but would complicate the existing grouping. -
D) Change the grouping of pairs in Step 2.
Changing the grouping might allow different terms to be combined, potentially creating a scenario for a shared binomial.
Given the analysis above, the best option that would help Kevin arrive at a shared binomial in Step 3 is:
A) Use different factors for −7x in Step 1.
This allows for potential combinations that can lead to a common factor in subsequent steps. Therefore, Kevin should try splitting −7x into different factors instead of −3x and −4x.