Question
Which sign makes the statement true?
-8 1/5
-8 3/4
(1 point)
>
<
=
-8 1/5
-8 3/4
(1 point)
>
<
=
Answers
Answer
Put these numbers in order from least to greatest.
13, 4/5, 0.9, 7/35 ,-13.5
Hint: You can change all the numbers to decimals if they are not already in that form to help you compare.
(1 point)
13
0.9
4/5
7/35
-13.5
13, 4/5, 0.9, 7/35 ,-13.5
Hint: You can change all the numbers to decimals if they are not already in that form to help you compare.
(1 point)
13
0.9
4/5
7/35
-13.5
Answer
Which expression is equivalent to 2 - 26?
Hint: What does the product rule of exponents tell us to do if the base is the same?
(1 point)
2^6
1/2^-7
2^7
2^5
Hint: What does the product rule of exponents tell us to do if the base is the same?
(1 point)
2^6
1/2^-7
2^7
2^5
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine the relation between the two numbers, we first need to convert them into improper fractions or decimals for easier comparison.
-8 1/5 can be converted to a decimal:
-8 1/5 = -8 - 0.2 = -8.2
-8 3/4 can be converted to a decimal:
-8 3/4 = -8 - 0.75 = -8.75
Now we compare -8.2 and -8.75:
-8.2 is greater than -8.75.
Therefore, the correct sign to make the statement true is:
**>**
So, -8 1/5 > -8 3/4.
-8 1/5 can be converted to a decimal:
-8 1/5 = -8 - 0.2 = -8.2
-8 3/4 can be converted to a decimal:
-8 3/4 = -8 - 0.75 = -8.75
Now we compare -8.2 and -8.75:
-8.2 is greater than -8.75.
Therefore, the correct sign to make the statement true is:
**>**
So, -8 1/5 > -8 3/4.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's convert all the numbers to decimals to make it easier to compare them:
1. **13**: This is already in decimal form.
2. **0.9**: This is already in decimal form.
3. **4/5**: To convert this to a decimal, we divide 4 by 5:
\[
4 ÷ 5 = 0.8
\]
4. **7/35**: To convert this to a decimal, we can simplify first:
\[
7 ÷ 35 = 0.2
\]
5. **-13.5**: This is already in decimal form.
Now we have the following decimal values:
- 13
- 0.9
- 0.8 (for 4/5)
- 0.2 (for 7/35)
- -13.5
Now, we can put these numbers in order from least to greatest:
- **-13.5**
- **0.2** (which is 7/35)
- **0.8** (which is 4/5)
- **0.9**
- **13**
Thus, the order from least to greatest is:
**-13.5, 7/35, 4/5, 0.9, 13**.
1. **13**: This is already in decimal form.
2. **0.9**: This is already in decimal form.
3. **4/5**: To convert this to a decimal, we divide 4 by 5:
\[
4 ÷ 5 = 0.8
\]
4. **7/35**: To convert this to a decimal, we can simplify first:
\[
7 ÷ 35 = 0.2
\]
5. **-13.5**: This is already in decimal form.
Now we have the following decimal values:
- 13
- 0.9
- 0.8 (for 4/5)
- 0.2 (for 7/35)
- -13.5
Now, we can put these numbers in order from least to greatest:
- **-13.5**
- **0.2** (which is 7/35)
- **0.8** (which is 4/5)
- **0.9**
- **13**
Thus, the order from least to greatest is:
**-13.5, 7/35, 4/5, 0.9, 13**.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To simplify the expression \(2 - 26\):
Using the properties of exponents, we can rewrite \(2 - 26\) as:
\[
2^1 - 2^6
\]
Now, using the product rule of exponents, we've established that \(a^m - a^n\) can factor out \(a^{\text{min}(m,n)}\):
\[
2^1 - 2^6 = 2^1(1 - 2^{6-1}) = 2^1(1 - 2^5)
\]
However, that doesn't quite match with your options, so let's analyze the numbers again directly in terms of exponents.
Note:
- \(2^6 = 64\)
- \(2^1 = 2\)
Calculating \(2 - 2^6\):
\[
2 - 64 = -62
\]
We can also interpret \(2 - 26\) as \(2 - 2^6\):
Now, looking at your options:
1. **\(2^6\)** is equal to \(64\).
2. **\(\frac{1}{2^{-7}}\)** simplifies to \(2^7\) (since \(\frac{1}{a^{-b}} = a^b\)).
3. **\(2^7 = 128\)**.
4. **\(2^5 = 32\)**.
None of these expressions simplify directly to \(2 - 26\).
However, if \(2 - 26\) means the difference in exponents. \( 26 = 2^6\), and thus can be interpreted as:
To arrive at equivalent forms:
\(-26 = - (2^6)\) could lead to interpret various comparisons.
If we are aligning exponentials/consolidating logical equivalents, writing the \(2^{-7}\) appears relevant in terms of inverse operations, maintaining relevance on potential similar queries.
So really focusing on the hint, understanding exponent bases and acknowledging \(1/2^{-7}\) could provide an adaptable critical point between alternatives.
Thus I can conclude:
The best representation from the options you listed would be **\(1/2^{-7}\)**.
If meant differently let me know for better evaluations.
Using the properties of exponents, we can rewrite \(2 - 26\) as:
\[
2^1 - 2^6
\]
Now, using the product rule of exponents, we've established that \(a^m - a^n\) can factor out \(a^{\text{min}(m,n)}\):
\[
2^1 - 2^6 = 2^1(1 - 2^{6-1}) = 2^1(1 - 2^5)
\]
However, that doesn't quite match with your options, so let's analyze the numbers again directly in terms of exponents.
Note:
- \(2^6 = 64\)
- \(2^1 = 2\)
Calculating \(2 - 2^6\):
\[
2 - 64 = -62
\]
We can also interpret \(2 - 26\) as \(2 - 2^6\):
Now, looking at your options:
1. **\(2^6\)** is equal to \(64\).
2. **\(\frac{1}{2^{-7}}\)** simplifies to \(2^7\) (since \(\frac{1}{a^{-b}} = a^b\)).
3. **\(2^7 = 128\)**.
4. **\(2^5 = 32\)**.
None of these expressions simplify directly to \(2 - 26\).
However, if \(2 - 26\) means the difference in exponents. \( 26 = 2^6\), and thus can be interpreted as:
To arrive at equivalent forms:
\(-26 = - (2^6)\) could lead to interpret various comparisons.
If we are aligning exponentials/consolidating logical equivalents, writing the \(2^{-7}\) appears relevant in terms of inverse operations, maintaining relevance on potential similar queries.
So really focusing on the hint, understanding exponent bases and acknowledging \(1/2^{-7}\) could provide an adaptable critical point between alternatives.
Thus I can conclude:
The best representation from the options you listed would be **\(1/2^{-7}\)**.
If meant differently let me know for better evaluations.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.