Asked by BTS ARMY
is the graph a function or not a function
input output
2 20
4 40
3 30
2 40
input output
2 20
4 40
3 30
2 40
Answers
Answered by
BTS ARMY
Which scenario best describes the graph:
the graph starts at (0,30) and ends at (10, 0)
(1 point)
Responses
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $1 each week.
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $1 each week.
Juan saves $30 per week.
Juan saves $30 per week.
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $5 each week.
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $5 each week.
Juan starts with $5 in savings and increases his savings amount by $30 each week.
Juan starts with $5 in savings and increases his savings amount by $30 each week.
Skip to navigation
the graph starts at (0,30) and ends at (10, 0)
(1 point)
Responses
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $1 each week.
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $1 each week.
Juan saves $30 per week.
Juan saves $30 per week.
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $5 each week.
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $5 each week.
Juan starts with $5 in savings and increases his savings amount by $30 each week.
Juan starts with $5 in savings and increases his savings amount by $30 each week.
Skip to navigation
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine if the given relation is a function, we need to check if each input is associated with exactly one output.
In your provided data:
- Input 2 has outputs 20 and 40 (not a function since input 2 maps to two different outputs).
- Input 4 has output 40.
- Input 3 has output 30.
Since the input 2 has more than one output, this relation is **not a function**. A function must have a unique output for each input.
In your provided data:
- Input 2 has outputs 20 and 40 (not a function since input 2 maps to two different outputs).
- Input 4 has output 40.
- Input 3 has output 30.
Since the input 2 has more than one output, this relation is **not a function**. A function must have a unique output for each input.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To analyze the graph that starts at (0, 30) and ends at (10, 0), we need to consider what these points mean in the context of savings over time:
- The starting point (0, 30) indicates that at week 0, Juan has $30 in savings.
- The endpoint (10, 0) indicates that at week 10, Juan has $0 in savings.
This suggests that Juan is losing money over time, which could imply that he is spending his savings rather than saving more.
Now let's evaluate the responses:
1. **Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $1 each week.**
- This would mean his savings increase, which does not describe a graph that goes from $30 to $0. **(Incorrect)**
2. **Juan saves $30 per week.**
- This would mean Juan's savings would increase, starting from $30 and continuing to grow, which does not match the graph. **(Incorrect)**
3. **Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $5 each week.**
- This again implies an increase in savings every week, which doesn't match the graph. **(Incorrect)**
4. **Juan starts with $5 in savings and increases his savings amount by $30 each week.**
- This also indicates an increase in savings, starting from a much lower point, leading to a growing amount, which does not match the graph. **(Incorrect)**
Given these options, none directly matches the description of a graph that starts with $30 and ends at $0 over a designated period. However, if the intent was for Juan to be spending money instead of saving it, the options provided do not capture that scenario accurately.
If I had to deduce a potential answer, it might involve something related to Juan spending his savings rather than saving or increasing them. However, based on the provided options, none seem to be a correct match for the scenario described by the graph.
- The starting point (0, 30) indicates that at week 0, Juan has $30 in savings.
- The endpoint (10, 0) indicates that at week 10, Juan has $0 in savings.
This suggests that Juan is losing money over time, which could imply that he is spending his savings rather than saving more.
Now let's evaluate the responses:
1. **Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $1 each week.**
- This would mean his savings increase, which does not describe a graph that goes from $30 to $0. **(Incorrect)**
2. **Juan saves $30 per week.**
- This would mean Juan's savings would increase, starting from $30 and continuing to grow, which does not match the graph. **(Incorrect)**
3. **Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $5 each week.**
- This again implies an increase in savings every week, which doesn't match the graph. **(Incorrect)**
4. **Juan starts with $5 in savings and increases his savings amount by $30 each week.**
- This also indicates an increase in savings, starting from a much lower point, leading to a growing amount, which does not match the graph. **(Incorrect)**
Given these options, none directly matches the description of a graph that starts with $30 and ends at $0 over a designated period. However, if the intent was for Juan to be spending money instead of saving it, the options provided do not capture that scenario accurately.
If I had to deduce a potential answer, it might involve something related to Juan spending his savings rather than saving or increasing them. However, based on the provided options, none seem to be a correct match for the scenario described by the graph.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.