To analyze the graph that starts at (0, 30) and ends at (10, 0), we need to consider what these points mean in the context of savings over time:
- The starting point (0, 30) indicates that at week 0, Juan has $30 in savings.
- The endpoint (10, 0) indicates that at week 10, Juan has $0 in savings.
This suggests that Juan is losing money over time, which could imply that he is spending his savings rather than saving more.
Now let's evaluate the responses:
-
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $1 each week.
- This would mean his savings increase, which does not describe a graph that goes from $30 to $0. (Incorrect)
-
Juan saves $30 per week.
- This would mean Juan's savings would increase, starting from $30 and continuing to grow, which does not match the graph. (Incorrect)
-
Juan starts with $30 in savings and increases his savings amount by $5 each week.
- This again implies an increase in savings every week, which doesn't match the graph. (Incorrect)
-
Juan starts with $5 in savings and increases his savings amount by $30 each week.
- This also indicates an increase in savings, starting from a much lower point, leading to a growing amount, which does not match the graph. (Incorrect)
Given these options, none directly matches the description of a graph that starts with $30 and ends at $0 over a designated period. However, if the intent was for Juan to be spending money instead of saving it, the options provided do not capture that scenario accurately.
If I had to deduce a potential answer, it might involve something related to Juan spending his savings rather than saving or increasing them. However, based on the provided options, none seem to be a correct match for the scenario described by the graph.