Asked by unknown no more
Fill in the spaces to solve each step of the problem 1/4(x+3)=5
.(2 points)
Step 1: (_)14(x+3)=5(_).
Step 2: x+3=__
Step 3: Subtract __ from both sides.
Step 4: x= __
fill in the blanks __
.(2 points)
Step 1: (_)14(x+3)=5(_).
Step 2: x+3=__
Step 3: Subtract __ from both sides.
Step 4: x= __
fill in the blanks __
Answers
Answered by
unknown no more
why is it in step one it isnt divide by 1/4? why is just 4? explain
Answered by
unknown no more
alr thank you!
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's solve the equation step by step and fill in the blanks.
The original equation is:
\[
\frac{1}{4}(x+3)=5.
\]
**Step 1**: Multiply both sides by 4 to eliminate the fraction:
\[
(4)\cdot\frac{1}{4}(x+3) = 5(4).
\]
This simplifies to:
\[
1(x+3) = 20.
\]
So in this step, you can fill in the blanks as follows:
\[
(4)14(x+3)=5(4).
\]
**Step 2**: From \(1(x+3) = 20\), we can simplify to:
\[
x+3=20.
\]
**Step 3**: Subtract 3 from both sides:
\[
x + 3 - 3 = 20 - 3.
\]
So we fill in the blank:
\[
\text{Subtract } 3 \text{ from both sides}.
\]
**Step 4**: This gives us:
\[
x = 17.
\]
Putting it all together, the filled-in blanks would be:
1. (4)14(x+3)=5(4).
2. x+3=20.
3. Subtract 3 from both sides.
4. x=17.
The original equation is:
\[
\frac{1}{4}(x+3)=5.
\]
**Step 1**: Multiply both sides by 4 to eliminate the fraction:
\[
(4)\cdot\frac{1}{4}(x+3) = 5(4).
\]
This simplifies to:
\[
1(x+3) = 20.
\]
So in this step, you can fill in the blanks as follows:
\[
(4)14(x+3)=5(4).
\]
**Step 2**: From \(1(x+3) = 20\), we can simplify to:
\[
x+3=20.
\]
**Step 3**: Subtract 3 from both sides:
\[
x + 3 - 3 = 20 - 3.
\]
So we fill in the blank:
\[
\text{Subtract } 3 \text{ from both sides}.
\]
**Step 4**: This gives us:
\[
x = 17.
\]
Putting it all together, the filled-in blanks would be:
1. (4)14(x+3)=5(4).
2. x+3=20.
3. Subtract 3 from both sides.
4. x=17.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
That's a great question! The process of solving the equation by multiplying both sides by \(4\) instead of dividing by \(\frac{1}{4}\) is indeed related. Here’s the step-by-step explanation:
When you have the equation:
\[
\frac{1}{4}(x + 3) = 5,
\]
you want to get rid of the fraction to make the equation easier to solve. Dividing by \(\frac{1}{4}\) is mathematically correct, but it can be a bit less straightforward for some people.
### Why Multiply by 4?
To eliminate the \(\frac{1}{4}\), you can multiply both sides of the equation by the reciprocal of \(\frac{1}{4}\), which is \(4\).
Here's how that looks:
1. **Multiply Both Sides by 4**:
\[
4 \times \frac{1}{4}(x + 3) = 4 \times 5.
\]
On the left-hand side, multiplying by \(4\) cancels \(\frac{1}{4}\):
\[
1(x + 3) = 20.
\]
This is because:
\[
4 \cdot \frac{1}{4} = 1.
\]
2. **Result**:
Now you are left with:
\[
x + 3 = 20.
\]
### Why Not Divide by \(\frac{1}{4}\)?
If you were to divide by \(\frac{1}{4}\), you would actually be multiplying by \(4\) (because dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal). Here’s how that looks mathematically:
\[
\frac{1}{4}(x + 3) = 5 \quad \Rightarrow \quad (x + 3) = 5 \div \frac{1}{4} = 5 \times 4 = 20.
\]
In both methods—multiplying by \(4\) or dividing by \(\frac{1}{4}\)—you arrive at the same equation, \(x + 3 = 20\). So, choosing to multiply by \(4\) is often simpler and more direct, especially when teaching or explaining the concept.
In summary, multiplying by \(4\) is just a straightforward alternative that achieves the same goal in a more intuitive and simpler way.
When you have the equation:
\[
\frac{1}{4}(x + 3) = 5,
\]
you want to get rid of the fraction to make the equation easier to solve. Dividing by \(\frac{1}{4}\) is mathematically correct, but it can be a bit less straightforward for some people.
### Why Multiply by 4?
To eliminate the \(\frac{1}{4}\), you can multiply both sides of the equation by the reciprocal of \(\frac{1}{4}\), which is \(4\).
Here's how that looks:
1. **Multiply Both Sides by 4**:
\[
4 \times \frac{1}{4}(x + 3) = 4 \times 5.
\]
On the left-hand side, multiplying by \(4\) cancels \(\frac{1}{4}\):
\[
1(x + 3) = 20.
\]
This is because:
\[
4 \cdot \frac{1}{4} = 1.
\]
2. **Result**:
Now you are left with:
\[
x + 3 = 20.
\]
### Why Not Divide by \(\frac{1}{4}\)?
If you were to divide by \(\frac{1}{4}\), you would actually be multiplying by \(4\) (because dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal). Here’s how that looks mathematically:
\[
\frac{1}{4}(x + 3) = 5 \quad \Rightarrow \quad (x + 3) = 5 \div \frac{1}{4} = 5 \times 4 = 20.
\]
In both methods—multiplying by \(4\) or dividing by \(\frac{1}{4}\)—you arrive at the same equation, \(x + 3 = 20\). So, choosing to multiply by \(4\) is often simpler and more direct, especially when teaching or explaining the concept.
In summary, multiplying by \(4\) is just a straightforward alternative that achieves the same goal in a more intuitive and simpler way.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
You're welcome! I'm glad I could help. If you have any more questions or if there's anything else you'd like to know, feel free to ask!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.