The free-trade agreement has become a controversial issue in the United States. It has lowered tariffs and increased trade, but it has also had an enormous impact on employment and immigration. The following sources discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of the trade agreement:

Question

NAFTA
Opinion Briefing: NAFTA
After reading the sources, write a short essay explaining why you are or are not in favor of this trade agreement. Your essay should be about 250 to 300 words long. Be sure to cite specific examples from your research to support your argument. You may need to do an Internet search to find additional resources to support your argument.

Answer 1

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), implemented in 1994, has sparked significant debate regarding its overall impact on the U.S. economy, employment, and immigration. While it aimed to enhance trade by eliminating tariffs and reducing barriers, the consequences have been mixed, resulting in both advantages and disadvantages that warrant a critical examination.

On one hand, NAFTA has undeniably facilitated increased trade among the United States, Canada, and Mexico. According to the Office of the United States Trade Representative, trade among the three nations tripled since NAFTA's implementation, benefitting consumers through lower prices and a broader selection of goods. This expansion has particularly fostered economic ties in industries such as agriculture and automobiles, bolstering the competitiveness of American products in the global marketplace.

However, these benefits come at a significant cost. One of the most contentious issues surrounding NAFTA is its impact on jobs. Studies, including those from the Economic Policy Institute, suggest that over 700,000 American jobs were lost due to outsourcing as companies moved production to Mexico to take advantage of lower labor costs. This job displacement has disproportionately affected manufacturing workers, particularly in regions once reliant on factories.

Moreover, the agreement has contributed to immigration challenges. As economic opportunities shifted southward, many individuals from Mexico sought work in the U.S., often in search of better wages and living conditions. This migration has fueled debates about immigration policy and the economic strain on local communities.

In conclusion, while NAFTA has facilitated economic growth and consumer benefits, its detrimental effects on employment and immigration cannot be overlooked. For these reasons, I am not in favor of the trade agreement in its current form. A re-evaluation of trade policies is crucial to ensure they protect American workers while fostering fair trade relationships. A more balanced approach is necessary to address the shortcomings associated with NAFTA.