Based on the article "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" by Peter Singer

Identify the conclusion of the following argument. Death by starvation is bad. I can prevent someone’s death by starvation without sacrificing anything of equal moral value. Therefore, I have a moral obligation to prevent that person’s death by starvation.

A. Death by starvation is bad.

B. I can prevent someone's death by starvation without sacrificing anything of equal moral value.

C. I have a moral obligation to prevent that person's death by starvation.

D. The problem of world hunger can be solved.

1 answer

The conclusion of the argument you provided is:

C. I have a moral obligation to prevent that person's death by starvation.

Similar Questions
  1. Based on the article "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" by Peter SingerAccording to Singer, if a conclusion validly follows from
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Based on the article "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" by Peter SingerOne conclusion that Singer reaches is that: A. We ought to
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Based on the article "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" by Peter SingerTrue or False Reading Singer’s article made me consider
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions