In "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," one of the objections that Peter Singer considers is that his view is too drastic of a revision to our moral scheme. Singer argues for a significant shift in how we perceive our moral obligations, particularly regarding aiding those in extreme poverty. Critics may find this suggestion too extreme or radical compared to traditional moral perspectives.
based on the article "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" by Peter Singer
One objection to his view that Singer considers is that his view is:
Question 1 options:
Self-contradictory.
Assumes the very thing he is trying to prove.
Oversimplified.
Too drastic of a revision to our moral scheme.
1 answer