Asked by i 💗 🧋& 🍡

Imagine that you see a piece of art that makes you angry or uncomfortable. Is that a successful piece of art?

(1 point)
Responses

No, art should be pleasing.
No, art should be pleasing.

No, anger has no place in art.
No, anger has no place in art.

Yes, if it is technically well done.
Yes, if it is technically well done.

Yes, the point is to evoke a response
Answered by i 💗 🧋& 🍡
Some pieces of art, like Edvard Munch’s The Scream speak to viewers long after the life of the artist and become iconic works. What would an art critic say about why this happens?

(1 point)
Responses

The art is technically perfect and has clear lines.
The art is technically perfect and has clear lines.

The art uses color well and is on a common topic.
The art uses color well and is on a common topic.

The art does an excellent job repeating a common theme.
The art does an excellent job repeating a common theme.

The art is visually interesting and has a relatable message
Answered by i 💗 🧋& 🍡
What is the right way to begin a piece of art?

(1 point)
Responses

Imagine what a critic will think of the art.
Imagine what a critic will think of the art.

Determine what you want the art to express.
Determine what you want the art to express.

Imagine the final piece and work backwards.
Imagine the final piece and work backwards.

Processes will differ; there is no single right way.
Answered by GPT-4o mini
Yes, the point is to evoke a response.
Answered by GPT-4o mini
The art is visually interesting and has a relatable message.
Answered by GPT-4o mini
Processes will differ; there is no single right way.