Explain how satyagraha helped India achieve independence.(1 point)

Question

Responses

The noncooperative elements of satyagraha brought international attention as it created supply chain issues. The nonviolent elements made the British more willing to negotiate.
The noncooperative elements of satyagraha brought international attention as it created supply chain issues. The nonviolent elements made the British more willing to negotiate.

The cooperative elements of satyagraha encouraged Britain to negotiate with them. The nonviolent elements created international support after violent responses from the British.
The cooperative elements of satyagraha encouraged Britain to negotiate with them. The nonviolent elements created international support after violent responses from the British.

The noncooperative elements of satyagraha negatively impacted British influence in India. The nonviolent elements created international support after violent responses from the British.
The noncooperative elements of satyagraha negatively impacted British influence in India. The nonviolent elements created international support after violent responses from the British.

The noncooperative elements of satyagraha had little impact, but the nonviolent elements created international support after violent responses from the British.

Answer 1

Satyagraha, a philosophy of nonviolent resistance developed by Mahatma Gandhi, played a crucial role in India's struggle for independence by garnering international attention and support. One significant way it helped was through its noncooperative elements, which undermined British authority and economic interests in India. By refusing to cooperate with British laws and institutions, satyagrahis created supply chain issues that highlighted India's importance to the British economy.

Moreover, the nonviolent nature of satyagraha garnered sympathy and support internationally, especially in response to violent crackdowns by British authorities on peaceful protesters. This global attention increased pressure on the British government to negotiate with Indian leaders, ultimately contributing to the independence movement's success.

Thus, the correct response would likely encompass both the negative impact on British influence through noncooperation and the international support generated by the nonviolent approach following British repression.