How did the views that oralists held about Deaf education differ from modern linguists?

Question

(1 point)
Responses

Oralists believed that the Deaf community only included those who were Deaf themselves, while modern linguists realize that the Deaf community encompasses the family members and others who interact with the Deaf community as well.

Oralists believed that the Deaf community only included those who were Deaf themselves, while modern linguists realize that the Deaf community encompasses the family members and others who interact with the Deaf community as well.

Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written language whereas modern linguists have found that learning sign language actually enhances the ability of both Deaf and hearing children to learn spoken and written language.

Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written lan

Answer 1

The correct response is:

Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written language whereas modern linguists have found that learning sign language actually enhances the ability of both Deaf and hearing children to learn spoken and written language.

This reflects the contrast between the oralist approach, which aimed to suppress sign language in favor of speech and auditory training, and contemporary linguistic understanding, which recognizes the cognitive and linguistic benefits of bilingualism in both sign and spoken language.