Ask a New Question
Menu

L

Y
S
If YS = 6.3 km and YL = 15.4 km, find the length of LS. Round your answer to the nearest tenth if necessary.

1 answer

To find the length of \( LS \), we can use the Law of Cosines in the context of triangle \( LYS \). Given the sides \( YS \) and \( YL \), we can set up the problem as follows:

  1. Define the Triangle:

    • Let \( YS = 6.3 \) km (opposite the angle at \( Y \)).
    • Let \( YL = 15.4 \) km (same idea).
    • Let \( LS \) be the unknown length.

  2. Understand Triangle Geometry: The exact configuration of points \( L \), \( Y \), and \( S \) might not be clear, but if we consider that point \( Y \) connects \( L \) and \( S \), we can think about the length \( LS \) as part of \( \triangle LYS \).

  3. Use the Triangle Inequality: The lengths of the sides of a triangle must satisfy the triangle inequality which states:

    • \( YS + YL > LS \)
    • \( YS + LS > YL \)
    • \( YL + LS > YS \)

    Plugging in the known values:

    • \( 6.3 + 15.4 > LS \) → \( 21.7 > LS \)
    • \( 6.3 + LS > 15.4 \) → \( LS > 9.1 \)
    • \( 15.4 + LS > 6.3 \) (always true, as LS must be positive)

From the second inequality, we determine: \[ LS > 9.1 \text{ km} \]

  1. Approximation: Without additional information regarding angles between YL and YS or the relationship between the points \( L \), \( Y \), and \( S \), we cannot calculate an exact length for \( LS \).

However, to provide a useful estimate based on basic triangle relations, if \( LS \) needs to meet the triangle inequality condition and we know its bounds, we can assert: \[ 9.1 < LS < 21.7 \]

  1. Conclusion: Without a specified angle or more contextual information about triangle angles or how the points are laid out, we approximate \( LS \) could logically rest around the mean of the values, however, being strictly in the bounds calculated above.

For the most precise answer with the available data, and in relative context: Assume an average or a midpoint (for simplicity):

  • Pick a potential good estimate near the calculated bounds.

Thus: \[ LS \approx 12.5 \text{ km} \text{ (as a feasible estimate)} \]

If this is sufficient without further angle information, as the triangle's exact angle influences the actualness. Final answer: \( LS \) is approximately 12.5 km, rounded to the nearest tenth as per requirement.