Why did southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified?

Question

1. It was not helpful to any section of the country
2. it benefited one section of the country at the expense of another
3. it increased the market for cotton
4. it increased foreign competition.

Answer 1

Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified primarily because 2. it benefited one section of the country at the expense of another. The tariff was seen as favoring Northern industrial interests while imposing higher costs on Southern consumers and agricultural producers. This created economic disparities, leading Southern states to view the tariff as unconstitutional and unjust, prompting discussions about nullification.

Answer 2

Which of the following did Andrew Jackson believe made the federal government "subversive to the rights of the states" and was a monopoly controlled by foreigners and the rich?
1. the bank of the United states
2. the united states constitution
3. the electoral college
4. the indian removal act

Answer 3

Andrew Jackson believed that 1. the Bank of the United States made the federal government "subversive to the rights of the states" and was a monopoly controlled by foreigners and the rich. Jackson opposed the Bank, viewing it as an institution that concentrated power and wealth in the hands of a few, undermining the democratic principles he championed. His opposition to the Bank was a significant aspect of his presidency and contributed to his reputation as a champion of the common man.

Answer 4

what is the unanswered question of the nullification crisis?
1. Does the federal government have absolute power to place tariffs on goods?
2. do the states have the right to nullify other states laws?
3. does the federal governemnt or do the states have greater rights and powers?
4. Do the states have the right to secede from the union?

Answer 5

The unanswered question of the nullification crisis is primarily 3. does the federal government or do the states have greater rights and powers? This question encapsulates the central tension between federal authority and states' rights, which was brought to the forefront during the nullification crisis. The conflict raised fundamental issues about the nature of the union and the extent of state versus federal power, which continued to be debated long after the crisis was resolved.