In 3–5 sentences, analyze the similarities and differences of the long-term effects of the Mongol Empire on China, Russia, and Iran.(4 points)

Question

BoldItalicUnderlineBullet listNumbered list

Short Answer Rubric (4 points)
Points Awarded Criteria
4
The answer is very clear.

The answer is fully supported by details.

There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

3
The answer is mostly clear.

The answer is supported by mostly relevant details.

There are a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

2
The answer is somewhat clear.

Details are weak or not related.

There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

1
The answer is not clear.

There are few or no supporting details.

There are many errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

0 The question is not answered.

Answer 1

The long-term effects of the Mongol Empire on China, Russia, and Iran exhibit both similarities and differences. All three regions experienced a degree of cultural exchange and economic integration due to the Mongol's vast trade networks, fostering interactions that influenced aspects of governance and culture. However, while China's experience led to the establishment of the Yuan Dynasty, which integrated Mongol and Chinese systems, Russia faced an extended period of Mongol rule that reinforced its isolation and delayed its development. Iran, on the other hand, found a middle path, incorporating Mongol administrative practices while maintaining a unique cultural identity.

Answer 2

In 3–5 sentences, analyze how overextension and fragmentation caused the collapse of the Mongol Empire.(4 points)
BoldItalicUnderlineBullet listNumbered list

Short Answer Rubric (4 points)
Points Awarded Criteria
4
The answer is very clear.

The answer is fully supported by details.

There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

3
The answer is mostly clear.

The answer is supported by mostly relevant details.

There are a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

2
The answer is somewhat clear.

Details are weak or not related.

There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

1
The answer is not clear.

There are few or no supporting details.

There are many errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

0 The question is not answered.

Answer 3

The collapse of the Mongol Empire can largely be attributed to overextension and fragmentation. As the empire expanded across vast territories, its centralized governance became increasingly difficult to maintain, leading to communication breakdowns and administrative challenges. This overextension strained resources and military capabilities, making it hard to suppress local uprisings and maintain order. Additionally, the division of the empire into several khanates fostered fragmentation, as regional leaders sought autonomy and pursued their own interests, ultimately undermining the unity necessary for the empire's survival.

Answer 4

In 3–5 sentences, assess the extent to which the Ming Dynasty developed productive connections with other countries, and include evidence.(4 points)
BoldItalicUnderlineBullet listNumbered list

Short Answer Rubric (4 points)
Points Awarded Criteria
4
The answer is very clear.

The answer is fully supported by details.

There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

3
The answer is mostly clear.

The answer is supported by mostly relevant details.

There are a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

2
The answer is somewhat clear.

Details are weak or not related.

There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

1
The answer is not clear.

There are few or no supporting details.

There are many errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

0 The question is not answered.

Answer 5

The Ming Dynasty developed significant productive connections with other countries, particularly through its maritime trade and diplomatic missions. The establishment of the tributary system allowed for structured trade relationships with neighboring states, such as Korea, Vietnam, and even Japan, facilitating the exchange of goods and cultural influences. Notably, the voyages of Admiral Zheng He in the early 15th century exemplified Ming maritime endeavors; his fleets reached as far as East Africa, creating diplomatic ties and trade opportunities that expanded China's influence. However, later in the dynasty, internal strife and a shift towards isolationism limited these connections, reflecting a complex relationship with the outside world.

Answer 6

In 3–5 sentences, assess how successful Russian imperial methods of political control were.(4 points)
BoldItalicUnderlineBullet listNumbered list

Short Answer Rubric (4 points)
Points Awarded Criteria
4
The answer is very clear.

The answer is fully supported by details.

There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

3
The answer is mostly clear.

The answer is supported by mostly relevant details.

There are a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

2
The answer is somewhat clear.

Details are weak or not related.

There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

1
The answer is not clear.

There are few or no supporting details.

There are many errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

0 The question is not answered.

Answer 7

Russian imperial methods of political control were relatively successful, particularly in the consolidation of power and expansion of territory. The implementation of a centralized bureaucracy allowed the Tsars to exert authority over vast regions, often employing a system of local governors or nobility to maintain order and loyalty. Additionally, the use of military force, such as during the conquest of Siberia, helped to suppress resistance and integrate diverse ethnic groups into the empire. However, this centralization also fostered discontent among various populations, leading to periodic uprisings, illustrating that while the methods were effective in the short term, they often sowed seeds of dissent that would challenge imperial stability in the long run.

Answer 8

In 1–2 sentences, compare the development of maritime empires with the development of land-based empires in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.(2 points)
BoldItalicUnderlineBullet listNumbered list

Short Answer Rubric (2 points)
Points Awarded Criteria
2
The answer is very clear.

The answer is fully supported by details.

There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

1
The answer is somewhat clear.

Details are weak or not related.

There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

0
The question is not answered.

Answer 9

During the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, maritime empires, such as those established by Spain and Portugal, focused on overseas exploration and trade, leading to the establishment of vast colonial networks and the exchange of goods across the Atlantic. In contrast, land-based empires, like the Ottoman and Mughal empires, expanded through territorial conquest, integrating diverse cultures and establishing centralized governance across significant land areas, thereby emphasizing military strength and administrative control.