The student's essay responds to the prompt by discussing both the positive outcomes and the potential problems associated with bike-sharing programs, specifically in the contexts of Chattanooga and New York City. The essay highlights positive impacts, such as improved personal health and a cleaner environment, while acknowledging concerns regarding safety and pollution. However, it ultimately argues that the benefits outweigh the problems.
Here are some points to consider regarding whether the student completed the assignment correctly:
-
Content: The essay addresses the prompt effectively, covering both sides of the argument. The student provides specific data, such as calorie burning in Chattanooga, carbon dioxide emissions reduction, and the decline in bicycle injuries.
-
Organization: The essay is organized logically, with separate sections for positive outcomes, concerns, and overall conclusions. However, there are some issues with transitions and flow between ideas, which could confuse the reader.
-
Clarity and Mechanics: There are multiple spelling errors and grammatical issues throughout the essay (e.g., "bile" instead of "bike," "emmisions" instead of "emissions," "expers" instead of "experts," etc.). These detract from the overall clarity and professionalism of the writing.
-
Style and Voice: The student uses a conversational tone, which can be engaging, but it may not be suitable for an academic essay. There's a mix of formal and informal language, which affects consistency.
-
Conclusion: The essay ends with a strong statement on the overall benefits of bike-sharing, but the phrasing is somewhat confusing and lacks precision.
Taking these points into account, here’s a possible breakdown for a score out of 100:
-
Content (30/40): The student provided a solid understanding of the topic and supported their argument with examples but could have elaborated further on the counterarguments.
-
Organization (15/20): The essay is generally well-structured, though some transitions could be better.
-
Clarity and Mechanics (10/20): The numerous spelling and grammatical errors greatly affect readability and professionalism.
-
Style and Voice (5/10): The style is inconsistent, and the use of informal language in certain areas detracts from the essay’s effectiveness.
Overall, I would score the essay 70 out of 100. The student did a good job of addressing the prompt but needs to work on clarity, mechanics, and maintaining a professional tone in their writing.