Question
Question
Use the properties of operations to add 9(k+13)+10(12k−1)
.(1 point)
Responses
14k+13
14 k plus 13
14k−23
14 k minus Start Fraction 2 over 3 End Fraction
1912k−23
19 Start Fraction 1 over 2 End Fraction k minus Start Fraction 2 over 3 End Fraction
14k−7
Use the properties of operations to add 9(k+13)+10(12k−1)
.(1 point)
Responses
14k+13
14 k plus 13
14k−23
14 k minus Start Fraction 2 over 3 End Fraction
1912k−23
19 Start Fraction 1 over 2 End Fraction k minus Start Fraction 2 over 3 End Fraction
14k−7
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To simplify the expression \( 9(k + 13) + 10(12k - 1) \), we will follow the steps of distributing and combining like terms.
1. Distribute \(9\) and \(10\):
\[
9(k + 13) = 9k + 117
\]
\[
10(12k - 1) = 120k - 10
\]
2. Now, combine the results:
\[
9k + 117 + 120k - 10
\]
3. Combine the like terms (the \(k\) terms and the constant terms):
\[
(9k + 120k) + (117 - 10) = 129k + 107
\]
So, the final simplified expression is:
\[
129k + 107
\]
However, none of the given options match this outcome. Let's check if additional discrepancies or if variables could lead you towards the selection.
If instead,
1. You meant to write a case of miscalculation or shortcuts.
2. Recheck the operations. Given you suspect certain options to be valid, then you can correlate specifics towards \(k\) adjustments; part by keeping check factorization towards both results. These might hint towards correct assembly.
But here's safely put the final derivative you derived:
\( 129k + 107 \)
Please review for exactness or if any context misses around operations' effects.
1. Distribute \(9\) and \(10\):
\[
9(k + 13) = 9k + 117
\]
\[
10(12k - 1) = 120k - 10
\]
2. Now, combine the results:
\[
9k + 117 + 120k - 10
\]
3. Combine the like terms (the \(k\) terms and the constant terms):
\[
(9k + 120k) + (117 - 10) = 129k + 107
\]
So, the final simplified expression is:
\[
129k + 107
\]
However, none of the given options match this outcome. Let's check if additional discrepancies or if variables could lead you towards the selection.
If instead,
1. You meant to write a case of miscalculation or shortcuts.
2. Recheck the operations. Given you suspect certain options to be valid, then you can correlate specifics towards \(k\) adjustments; part by keeping check factorization towards both results. These might hint towards correct assembly.
But here's safely put the final derivative you derived:
\( 129k + 107 \)
Please review for exactness or if any context misses around operations' effects.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.