10 PM and 7 AM. The Daily investigated this ordinance to inform its readers as they decide whether to vote "yes" or "no."
Supporters of the ordinance claim that this law would lead to a more peaceful and better rested community. This is because around 50% of town residents are still sleeping until 7 AM, and so they are unnecessarily woken by loud noises such as car horns and lawnmowers. For example, town resident Julia Smith often does not return from work as an ER nurse until after midnight, yet is regularly woken by her neighbors honking their horns at 5:30 AM. In addition, kids who need to be up for school by 6 AM
often cannot fall asleep by 10 PM due to excessive noise.
However, opponents of the ordinance believe that this law would violate their rights. In the words of resident Derek Green, "What happens if I need to shout or honk my horn in case of an emergency? Will I have to worry about neighbors calling the police?"
What do you think? We hope you will consider this information as you make your selection at the ballot box this election season.
Which additional detail would be most effective to add to paragraph 3? (1 point)
O needed and woud be too afficult to ten orcenance is not
O aftected by being woken a nignt by loud noses. has been
"It shouldn't be that difficult to respect one's neighbors and not
O wake them up at all hours of the night," said resident Gabrielle
Tafoya.
It appears that just a few residents have been causing most of
• the noise at night.
1 answer
The most effective detail to add to paragraph 3 would be:
"It shouldn't be that difficult to respect one's neighbors and not wake them up at all hours of the night," said resident Gabrielle Tafoya.
This quote adds a personal touch and reinforces the notion of community consideration while also addressing Derek Green's concerns in a constructive manner. It balances the opposing viewpoints by emphasizing the idea of neighborly respect and cooperation.
