Question
How did the views that oralists held about Deaf education differ from modern linguists?
(1 point)
Responses
Oralists believed that the Deaf community only included those who were Deaf themselves, while modern linguists realize that the Deaf community encompasses the family members and others who interact with the Deaf community as well.
Oralists believed that the Deaf community only included those who were Deaf themselves, while modern linguists realize that the Deaf community encompasses the family members and others who interact with the Deaf community as well.
Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written language whereas modern linguists have found that learning sign language actually enhances the ability of both Deaf and hearing children to learn spoken and written language.
Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written language whereas modern linguists have found that learning sign language actually enhances the ability of both Deaf and hearing children to learn spoken and written language.
Oralists preferred to teach methods of speechreading while modern linguists assert that it is necessary to also teach some form of sign.
Oralists preferred to teach methods of speechreading while modern linguists assert that it is necessary to also teach some form of sign.
Oralists advocated for the establishment of a Deaf state in the Western United States, while modern linguists support an integration of both Deaf and hearing communities in all states.
(1 point)
Responses
Oralists believed that the Deaf community only included those who were Deaf themselves, while modern linguists realize that the Deaf community encompasses the family members and others who interact with the Deaf community as well.
Oralists believed that the Deaf community only included those who were Deaf themselves, while modern linguists realize that the Deaf community encompasses the family members and others who interact with the Deaf community as well.
Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written language whereas modern linguists have found that learning sign language actually enhances the ability of both Deaf and hearing children to learn spoken and written language.
Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written language whereas modern linguists have found that learning sign language actually enhances the ability of both Deaf and hearing children to learn spoken and written language.
Oralists preferred to teach methods of speechreading while modern linguists assert that it is necessary to also teach some form of sign.
Oralists preferred to teach methods of speechreading while modern linguists assert that it is necessary to also teach some form of sign.
Oralists advocated for the establishment of a Deaf state in the Western United States, while modern linguists support an integration of both Deaf and hearing communities in all states.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The correct response is:
Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written language whereas modern linguists have found that learning sign language actually enhances the ability of both Deaf and hearing children to learn spoken and written language.
This highlights the fundamental difference in perspective regarding the relationship between sign language and the acquisition of spoken/written language.
Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written language whereas modern linguists have found that learning sign language actually enhances the ability of both Deaf and hearing children to learn spoken and written language.
This highlights the fundamental difference in perspective regarding the relationship between sign language and the acquisition of spoken/written language.