The author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints in several sentences throughout the text. Here are a few examples:
-
Acknowledgment of counterarguments regarding effectiveness:
- "Some people claim that solar panels are not effective because the sun doesn't actually shine 24 hours a day. They argue that because solar panels stop producing electricity at night, people still need to depend on other sources of energy."
- This sentence acknowledges the viewpoint that solar panels have limitations due to their reliance on sunlight.
-
Response to the counterargument about energy production:
- "Although this may be true, they fail to take into account that people use the most energy during the day. The majority of people are most active when the sun is in full force."
- The author counters the claim by explaining the timing of energy demand, suggesting that solar panels' productivity aligns with when energy is mostly needed.
-
Acknowledgment of concerns over cost:
- "Another noted disadvantage to solar power is that the production and installation costs of solar panels are very expensive and time consuming."
- This sentence recognizes the concern that the investment in solar panels is significant.
-
Response to the cost concern:
- "However, one should consider that the cost of installation is a long-term investment for homeowners that will save people money over time."
- Here, the author counters the negative perception of high initial costs by framing them as a long-term benefit and savings.
-
Summary statement about weighing pros and cons:
- "People should seriously consider the benefits of solar energy by weighing the pros over the cons."
- This sentence emphasizes the necessity of evaluating both sides before reaching a conclusion, indicating that conflicting viewpoints need to be balanced.
Overall, the author effectively acknowledges opposing viewpoints and provides counterarguments to support the case for solar energy.