If the equation 182 + b2 = 302

is found to be true, what do we know about the triangle?(1 point)
Responses

The triangle is a right triangle, and the hypotenuse is 18.
The triangle is a right triangle, and the hypotenuse is 18.

The triangle is a right triangle, and the legs are 30 and 24.
The triangle is a right triangle, and the legs are 30 and 24.

The triangle is a right triangle with a missing side of 34.99.
The triangle is a right triangle with a missing side of 34.99.

The triangle is a right triangle with a missing leg length of 24.

1 answer

To solve the equation 182+b2=302, we first isolate b2:

b2=302182 b2=120

Now, we take the square root of both sides to find b:

b=12010.95

Since the problem describes a triangle, it suggests using the Pythagorean theorem, which states that for a right triangle with legs a and b, and hypotenuse c:

a2+b2=c2

From the information given, we can interpret 182 as one leg squared (a2), and b2 as the other leg squared. We can determine the lengths of the sides involved. We need to recognize the value obtained is related to the sides of a right triangle.

Given our findings, let's analyze the provided responses with respect to our calculations:

  1. The triangle is a right triangle, and the hypotenuse is 18.
  2. The triangle is a right triangle, and the legs are 30 and 24.
  3. The triangle is a right triangle with a missing side of 34.99.
  4. The triangle is a right triangle with a missing leg length of 24.

From our calculation, we consider 182 corresponding to one leg squared and 120 to the other leg squared, implying b is actually the leg opposite to it.

To find the total of the hypotenuse:

The legs we find, 182 which is approximately 13.5.

Additionally, 12010.95.

By Pythagorean theorem:

The hypotenuse c would be:

c=182+120=30217.35

None of the answer choices fit exactly based on the calculations and results we've found, so the triangle characteristics detailed do not match.

If we assume 18 is a rounded hypotenuse acceptable by approximate evaluation but since none of the specific options is accurate or tightly matched, please use that understanding to decide selections or clarify based on the mathematical results resonating fundamentals about right triangles.

In conclusion, from the options presented, even though none fits perfectly based on the calculations, it seems we are to suggest the triangle has certain relationships provided. None exactly apply, leading to potentially the correct but less accurate assumptions without fitting numeric precision or clarity directly stemming from what we've established in calculations above, or finding 302 approximating toward given leg evaluations discussed.