Fox's proof involves showing that the base angles of an isosceles triangle are congruent. The proof itself is mostly correct, but it contains an error in the interpretation of angles and the congruence relationship.
Critique of the Reasoning:
- Statement 6: The conclusion is flawed. The angle B measured in triangle ABD is not equal to angle C measured in triangle ACD since the angle notation and congruence are mistyped. In fact, in triangle ABC, you want to prove that angles B and C are congruent, not A and C.
Incorrect Statements:
- Statement 6 has a mistake.
- It should say “∠B ≅ ∠C.” Instead of stating a different relationship involving angle A.
How to Fix the Mistake:
To fix the mistake, Fox should ensure that once he proves triangles ABD and ACD are congruent, he clearly states that from the congruence of those triangles, the corresponding angles are also congruent.
Corrected Conclusion:
Add a step after statement 5:
- After establishing that triangles ABD and ACD are congruent, you would explicitly state:
- 6. ∠B ≅ ∠C (because corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent).
Thus, the reasoning of Fox's proof should clearly indicate that he is showing angles B and C are congruent as the conclusion of the proof, confirming the Base Angles Theorem for triangle ABC.