Asked by Nooooo!!!!!!!
Solve 1/4x−3/4>5 1/4.(1 point)
x>2/4
x>18
x 1/8 x > 21 3/4
x >1 1/2
x>2/4
x>18
x 1/8 x > 21 3/4
x >1 1/2
Answers
Answered by
Nooooo!!!!!!!
there is no x >23
Answered by
Nooooo!!!!!!!
x>2/4
x>18
x 1/8 x > 21 3/4
x >1 1/2
x>18
x 1/8 x > 21 3/4
x >1 1/2
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To solve the inequality \( \frac{1}{4}x - \frac{3}{4} > 5 \), we can follow these steps:
1. **Add \( \frac{3}{4} \) to both sides**:
\[
\frac{1}{4}x > 5 + \frac{3}{4}
\]
To add \( 5 \) and \( \frac{3}{4} \), we can convert \( 5 \) to a fraction with a denominator of \( 4 \):
\[
5 = \frac{20}{4}
\]
So,
\[
\frac{1}{4}x > \frac{20}{4} + \frac{3}{4} = \frac{23}{4}
\]
2. **Multiply both sides by \( 4 \)** (to eliminate the fraction):
\[
x > 23
\]
Thus, the solution to the inequality is:
\[
x > 23
\]
From the options you've given, the closest match is \( x > 21 \frac{3}{4} \). However, the exact solution is \( x > 23 \).
1. **Add \( \frac{3}{4} \) to both sides**:
\[
\frac{1}{4}x > 5 + \frac{3}{4}
\]
To add \( 5 \) and \( \frac{3}{4} \), we can convert \( 5 \) to a fraction with a denominator of \( 4 \):
\[
5 = \frac{20}{4}
\]
So,
\[
\frac{1}{4}x > \frac{20}{4} + \frac{3}{4} = \frac{23}{4}
\]
2. **Multiply both sides by \( 4 \)** (to eliminate the fraction):
\[
x > 23
\]
Thus, the solution to the inequality is:
\[
x > 23
\]
From the options you've given, the closest match is \( x > 21 \frac{3}{4} \). However, the exact solution is \( x > 23 \).
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's solve the inequality step-by-step again to ensure we find the correct solution.
We want to solve the inequality:
\[
\frac{1}{4}x - \frac{3}{4} > 5
\]
1. **Add \(\frac{3}{4}\) to both sides**:
\[
\frac{1}{4}x > 5 + \frac{3}{4}
\]
First, we convert \(5\) into a fraction with a denominator of \(4\):
\[
5 = \frac{20}{4}
\]
Now adding:
\[
5 + \frac{3}{4} = \frac{20}{4} + \frac{3}{4} = \frac{23}{4}
\]
So, the inequality becomes:
\[
\frac{1}{4}x > \frac{23}{4}
\]
2. **Multiply both sides by \(4\)**:
\[
x > 23
\]
It seems I made an error initially by not properly addressing the solution set in the context of the provided options. If none of the options you provided match \(x > 23\), let me look closely at the possible options you've listed again:
- \(x > \frac{2}{4}\)
- \(x > 18\)
- \(x > \frac{21}{4}\)
- \(x > \frac{3}{2}\)
The closest response to the solution \(x > 23\) is indeed not in the provided options, but comparing \(x > 21 \frac{3}{4} (which is \frac{87}{4})\), if interpreted as greater, isn't an option.
### Conclusion
I'll recheck if they meant a surrounding range or other contextual adjustments beyond standard calculations. However, purely calculatively, the correct resolution remains:
\[
x > 23
\]
If you were to clarify any options or further parameters of consideration, feel free to let me know!
We want to solve the inequality:
\[
\frac{1}{4}x - \frac{3}{4} > 5
\]
1. **Add \(\frac{3}{4}\) to both sides**:
\[
\frac{1}{4}x > 5 + \frac{3}{4}
\]
First, we convert \(5\) into a fraction with a denominator of \(4\):
\[
5 = \frac{20}{4}
\]
Now adding:
\[
5 + \frac{3}{4} = \frac{20}{4} + \frac{3}{4} = \frac{23}{4}
\]
So, the inequality becomes:
\[
\frac{1}{4}x > \frac{23}{4}
\]
2. **Multiply both sides by \(4\)**:
\[
x > 23
\]
It seems I made an error initially by not properly addressing the solution set in the context of the provided options. If none of the options you provided match \(x > 23\), let me look closely at the possible options you've listed again:
- \(x > \frac{2}{4}\)
- \(x > 18\)
- \(x > \frac{21}{4}\)
- \(x > \frac{3}{2}\)
The closest response to the solution \(x > 23\) is indeed not in the provided options, but comparing \(x > 21 \frac{3}{4} (which is \frac{87}{4})\), if interpreted as greater, isn't an option.
### Conclusion
I'll recheck if they meant a surrounding range or other contextual adjustments beyond standard calculations. However, purely calculatively, the correct resolution remains:
\[
x > 23
\]
If you were to clarify any options or further parameters of consideration, feel free to let me know!
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Thank you for your patience. Let's clarify the given options based on the solution we derived, which is \(x > 23\).
Here are the options you provided with simplified values where necessary:
1. \(x > \frac{2}{4}\) (which simplifies to \(x > \frac{1}{2}\))
2. \(x > 18\)
3. \(x > 21 \frac{3}{4}\) (which equals \(x > \frac{87}{4} = 21.75\))
4. \(x > 1 \frac{1}{2}\) (which equals \(x > \frac{3}{2} = 1.5\))
### Comparison with the derived solution \(x > 23\):
- **Option 1**: \(x > \frac{1}{2}\) is less than 23.
- **Option 2**: \(x > 18\) is less than 23.
- **Option 3**: \(x > 21 \frac{3}{4}\) is also less than 23.
- **Option 4**: \(x > 1 \frac{1}{2}\) is less than 23.
None of the provided options match the solution \(x > 23\).
### Clarifying the options:
If you were looking for which conditions are true or meet to come close to the derived answer, we identify that **none of those options satisfy \(x > 23\)**.
Typically in such contexts, option \(3\) \(x > 21 \frac{3}{4}\) ends up being the closest comparative scenario, if we would've to assume a possible selection on the most robust margin boundedly substantial toward 23.
If further clarifications or adjustments to options exist, do let me know!
Here are the options you provided with simplified values where necessary:
1. \(x > \frac{2}{4}\) (which simplifies to \(x > \frac{1}{2}\))
2. \(x > 18\)
3. \(x > 21 \frac{3}{4}\) (which equals \(x > \frac{87}{4} = 21.75\))
4. \(x > 1 \frac{1}{2}\) (which equals \(x > \frac{3}{2} = 1.5\))
### Comparison with the derived solution \(x > 23\):
- **Option 1**: \(x > \frac{1}{2}\) is less than 23.
- **Option 2**: \(x > 18\) is less than 23.
- **Option 3**: \(x > 21 \frac{3}{4}\) is also less than 23.
- **Option 4**: \(x > 1 \frac{1}{2}\) is less than 23.
None of the provided options match the solution \(x > 23\).
### Clarifying the options:
If you were looking for which conditions are true or meet to come close to the derived answer, we identify that **none of those options satisfy \(x > 23\)**.
Typically in such contexts, option \(3\) \(x > 21 \frac{3}{4}\) ends up being the closest comparative scenario, if we would've to assume a possible selection on the most robust margin boundedly substantial toward 23.
If further clarifications or adjustments to options exist, do let me know!