The statement that best explains the reason Congress passed the Fifteenth Amendment is: to protect the ability of Freedmen to participate in choosing a government through voting. The Fifteenth Amendment, ratified in 1870, was specifically designed to ensure that the right to vote could not be denied to citizens based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Which statement best explains the reason Congress passed the Fifteenth Amendment?(1 point) Responses to protect the ability of Freedmen to participate in choosing a government through voting to protect the ability of Freedmen to participate in choosing a government through voting to stop poll taxes from creating an economic barrier to voting in the South to stop poll taxes from creating an economic barrier to voting in the South to guarantee equal protection under the law to Freedmen to guarantee equal protection under the law to Freedmen to guarantee the right to vote for women
11 answers
Why was the creation of the National American Women Suffrage Movement in 1890 a critical event in the Women’s Suffrage Movement?(1 point) Responses It focused on getting the right to vote through the Fourteenth Amendment. It focused on getting the right to vote through the Fourteenth Amendment. It canceled all public rallies to avoid bad publicity for the Women’s Suffrage Movement. It canceled all public rallies to avoid bad publicity for the Women’s Suffrage Movement. It lobbied Congress to quickly pass the Nineteenth Amendment. It lobbied Congress to quickly pass the Nineteenth Amendment. It led to a focus on changing state laws to allow women to vote.
The statement that best explains why the creation of the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) in 1890 was a critical event in the Women’s Suffrage Movement is: It led to a focus on changing state laws to allow women to vote. While NAWSA did also support a federal amendment, its initial efforts helped coordinate state-level campaigns and strategies to secure voting rights for women.
Which of the following describes how the three Reconstruction Amendments extended and limited civil rights to Black Americans?(1 point) Responses The Reconstruction Amendments freed Black Americans, defined citizenship, reversed the Three-Fifths Compromise, and extended voting rights to Black American men, but put restrictions on voting rights and did not prevent the separate but equal doctrine. The Reconstruction Amendments freed Black Americans, defined citizenship, reversed the Three-Fifths Compromise, and extended voting rights to Black American men, but put restrictions on voting rights and did not prevent the separate but equal doctrine. The Reconstruction Amendments abolished slavery, defined citizenship, extended voting rights for all citizens, and defined equal protections and due process, but put restrictions on voting rights and did not prevent the separate but equal doctrine. The Reconstruction Amendments abolished slavery, defined citizenship, extended voting rights for all citizens, and defined equal protections and due process, but put restrictions on voting rights and did not prevent the separate but equal doctrine. The Reconstruction Amendments abolished slavery, defined citizenship, and protected Black Americans’ civil rights under the separate but equal clause, but put restrictions on voting rights and land ownership. The Reconstruction Amendments abolished slavery, defined citizenship, and protected Black Americans’ civil rights under the separate but equal clause, but put restrictions on voting rights and land ownership. The Reconstruction Amendments freed Black Americans, defined citizenship, extended voting rights for Black American men, and established Jim Crow laws, but put restrictions on voting rights and did not prevent the separate but equal doctrine.
The statement that best describes how the three Reconstruction Amendments extended and limited civil rights to Black Americans is: The Reconstruction Amendments freed Black Americans, defined citizenship, reversed the Three-Fifths Compromise, and extended voting rights to Black American men, but put restrictions on voting rights and did not prevent the separate but equal doctrine.
This reflects the key achievements of the Thirteenth Amendment (abolition of slavery), the Fourteenth Amendment (defining citizenship and providing equal protection), and the Fifteenth Amendment (granting voting rights), while also acknowledging the limitations that persisted, such as discriminatory practices and the eventual establishment of Jim Crow laws.
Which of the following answers best analyzes the impact of the Supreme Court case rulings of Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education on individual freedoms and equal protection?(1 point) Responses Plessy v. Ferguson created the separate but equal doctrine and Brown v. Board ended the separate but equal doctrine in public education. Plessy v. Ferguson created the separate but equal doctrine and Brown v. Board ended the separate but equal doctrine in public education. Plessy v. Ferguson created Jim Crow laws and Brown v. Board created the separate but equal doctrine in public transportation. Plessy v. Ferguson created Jim Crow laws and Brown v. Board created the separate but equal doctrine in public transportation. Plessy v. Ferguson set the precedent to the separate but equal doctrine and Brown v. Board abolished the Separate Car Act. Plessy v. Ferguson set the precedent to the separate but equal doctrine and Brown v. Board abolished the Separate Car Act. Plessy v. Ferguson reestablished Jim Crow laws and Brown v. Board made segregation in public settings constitutional.
The answer that best analyzes the impact of the Supreme Court case rulings of Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education on individual freedoms and equal protection is: Plessy v. Ferguson created the separate but equal doctrine and Brown v. Board ended the separate but equal doctrine in public education.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) upheld state laws establishing racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine, while Brown v. Board of Education (1954) ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, effectively overturning the precedent set by Plessy in the context of education.
Which of the following was an outcome of Obergefell v. Hodges?(1 point) Responses Same-sex couples were allowed to marry. Same-sex couples were allowed to marry. Public buildings had have wheelchair access. Public buildings had have wheelchair access. Mixed-race couples were allowed to marry. Mixed-race couples were allowed to marry. College sports teams had to provide equal programs for women.
The outcome of Obergefell v. Hodges was: Same-sex couples were allowed to marry. The Supreme Court ruling in this 2015 case legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, affirming that the right to marry is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 abolished which of the following?(1 point) Responses an open borders policy an open borders policy criminal penalties for entering the United States without proper documentation criminal penalties for entering the United States without proper documentation monetary qualifications for entry into the United States monetary qualifications for entry into the United States an immigration quota system
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 abolished: an immigration quota system. This act eliminated the national origins quota system that had been in place since the 1920s, which heavily favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe, and it established a new policy based on reuniting immigrant families and attracting skilled labor to the United States.