To transform the first graph, which represents the cost of the t-shirts at $12 per shirt (a proportional relationship), into a non-proportional graph that has the same y-intercept as the second graph (which has a $20 setup fee), you need to add a fixed cost that represents that setup fee.
The first graph can be described by the equation: \[ y = 12x \] where \( y \) is the total cost and \( x \) is the number of t-shirts.
To make this a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second business (which charges \( y = 11x + 20 \) and has a y-intercept of 20), you would need to add a constant of 20 to the first graph's equation.
Thus, the transformation would be: \[ y = 12x + 20 \]
This transformation represents moving the graph up by 20 units, which gives it the same y-intercept as the second graph.
Therefore, the answer is: Up 20.