How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling?

Question

How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling?

It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States.
It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States.

It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land.
It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land.

It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees.
It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees.

It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state.
It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state.

Answer 1

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
3 hours ago

The correct option that highlights how the Indian Removal Act of 1830 went against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling is:

It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States.

The Worcester v. Georgia decision, issued by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1832, recognized the sovereignty of Native American nations and stated that the state of Georgia could not impose its laws on Cherokee territory. However, the Indian Removal Act facilitated the forced relocation of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands, effectively disregarding the sovereignty and legal rights established in the Court's ruling.