To complete the proof correctly, we need to establish a missing statement that allows us to apply the AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) theorem.
The structure of your proof indicates that we are working with two triangles, \( \triangle SXU \) and \( \triangle TVS \), and that we have established some corresponding angles and sides that support their congruence.
- Given: \(\angle TXU \cong \angle TVS\) (given)
- Reflexive Property: \(\angle STV \cong \angle UTX\) (reflexive property)
- Equilateral Triangle: \(\triangle STU\) is an equilateral triangle (given)
- Sides of an Equilateral Triangle: \(ST \cong UT\) (sides of an equilateral triangle are congruent)
- Missing Statement: \(\angle SXU \cong \angle SVT\) (these angles are both 60 degrees because \( \triangle STU \) is equilateral, and thus each angle measures 60 degrees)
- AAS: \(\triangle SXU \cong \triangle TVS\) (two angles and the non-included side are congruent)
- CPCTC: \(UX \cong SV\) (corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent)
So, the missing statement in the proof is:
Statement: \(\angle SXU \cong \angle SVT\)
Reason: Angles in an equilateral triangle are all \(60^\circ\).
With this addition, the proof is completed by confirming that the triangles \( \triangle SXU \) and \( \triangle TVS \) are indeed congruent using the AAS condition, allowing us to conclude that \( UX \cong SV \).