Asked by neko :3
The proof that ΔRST ≅ ΔVST is shown.
Given: ST is the perpendicular bisector of RV.
Prove: ΔRST ≅ ΔVST
Triangle R S V is cut by perpendicular bisector S T. Point T is the midpoint of line segment R V.
What is the missing reason in the proof?
Statements Reasons
1. ST is the perpendicular bisector of RV. 1. given
2. ∠STR and ∠STV are right angles. 2. def. of perpendicular bisector
3. RS ≅ VS 3. ?
4. ST ≅ ST 4. reflexive property
5. ΔRST ≅ ΔVST 5. HL theorem
perpendicular bisector theorem
converse of the perpendicular bisector theorem
Pythagorean theorem
SSS congruence theor
Given: ST is the perpendicular bisector of RV.
Prove: ΔRST ≅ ΔVST
Triangle R S V is cut by perpendicular bisector S T. Point T is the midpoint of line segment R V.
What is the missing reason in the proof?
Statements Reasons
1. ST is the perpendicular bisector of RV. 1. given
2. ∠STR and ∠STV are right angles. 2. def. of perpendicular bisector
3. RS ≅ VS 3. ?
4. ST ≅ ST 4. reflexive property
5. ΔRST ≅ ΔVST 5. HL theorem
perpendicular bisector theorem
converse of the perpendicular bisector theorem
Pythagorean theorem
SSS congruence theor
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To find the missing reason for statement 3, "RS ≅ VS", we need to consider the properties of the perpendicular bisector.
Since ST is the perpendicular bisector of segment RV, by the definition of a perpendicular bisector, we know that it divides RV into two equal segments at point T, which is the midpoint of RV. This means that:
\[ RT = TV \]
According to the Perpendicular Bisector Theorem, for any point on the perpendicular bisector of a segment, the distances from that point to the endpoints of the segment are equal. Therefore, we can conclude that:
\[ RS = VS \]
Thus, the missing reason for statement 3 is:
**Perpendicular bisector theorem.**
So the completed proof statements would look like this:
Statements Reasons
1. ST is the perpendicular bisector of RV. 1. given
2. ∠STR and ∠STV are right angles. 2. def. of perpendicular bisector
3. RS ≅ VS 3. perpendicular bisector theorem
4. ST ≅ ST 4. reflexive property
5. ΔRST ≅ ΔVST 5. HL theorem
Since ST is the perpendicular bisector of segment RV, by the definition of a perpendicular bisector, we know that it divides RV into two equal segments at point T, which is the midpoint of RV. This means that:
\[ RT = TV \]
According to the Perpendicular Bisector Theorem, for any point on the perpendicular bisector of a segment, the distances from that point to the endpoints of the segment are equal. Therefore, we can conclude that:
\[ RS = VS \]
Thus, the missing reason for statement 3 is:
**Perpendicular bisector theorem.**
So the completed proof statements would look like this:
Statements Reasons
1. ST is the perpendicular bisector of RV. 1. given
2. ∠STR and ∠STV are right angles. 2. def. of perpendicular bisector
3. RS ≅ VS 3. perpendicular bisector theorem
4. ST ≅ ST 4. reflexive property
5. ΔRST ≅ ΔVST 5. HL theorem
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.