how is this for a Text that claims how the U.S.-Mexican War was justified!

Your text presents a strong perspective on the justification of the U.S.-Mexican War, effectively highlighting key elements such as Manifest Destiny, territorial expansion, and cultural conflicts. However, to enhance clarity, depth, and engagement, consider the following suggestions:

1. Introductions and Thesis Statement: Start with a more defined thesis statement that encapsulates your main argument about the justification for the war.

   Example: "The U.S.-Mexican War was justified, as it represented an inevitable response to Mexico's resistance against American expansion driven by the belief in Manifest Destiny."

2. Structure and Flow: Organize your points more clearly. Use paragraph breaks to separate different themes, such as the situation in Texas, the concept of Manifest Destiny, and the impact of the Alamo.

3. Citations and Sources: When you reference specific texts, like 'The History of Mexico' by Burton Corkwood or the Texas State Library and Archive Commission, ensure proper formatting of citations and provide context for the quotes used.

4. Counterarguments: Acknowledge potential counterarguments, such as the plight of Mexican citizens or the ethics of expansionism, even briefly. This could strengthen your argument by showing that you've considered multiple perspectives.

5. Language and Tone: While the informal tone ("This is MY land! GET OFF MY LAWN!") can engage readers, it may come off as overly casual for an academic discussion. Additionally, check for consistency in voice throughout the text.

6. Conclusion: Enhance your conclusion by summarizing the main arguments made and reflecting on the long-term implications of the war on U.S.-Mexico relations and on American identity.

Revised Sample Paragraph:

The U.S.-Mexican War was fundamentally justified as a manifestation of America's belief in Manifest Destiny and its inevitable territorial expansion. By the mid-19th century, settlement in Texas highlighted cultural tensions that arose between American immigrants and Mexican citizens. As Mexico enforced stricter laws to govern its territory, tensions escalated, culminating in a declaration of Texan independence that Mexico viewed as an act of aggression. As described in Burton Corkwood's "The History of Mexico," the annexation of Texas in 1845 was seen by many Americans as a logical step following the expansion of U.S. territory after the Louisiana Purchase. This belief in Manifest Destiny fueled the notion that expansion was a right, leading to the conflict that ensued. The struggles during this period, including the failed Treaties of Velasco and the pivotal Battle of the Alamo, reveal the deep convictions held by many who fought for what they believed was their rightful territory. Ultimately, the conclusion of the war with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848 solidified this conviction, linking their sacrifices to the broader narrative of American identity and expansion.

Taking these suggestions into account should improve the overall cohesiveness of your argument and enhance the analytical depth of your writing.

Why the Mexican-American War was justified.
By James Mulcahey
The U.S.-Mexico War was justified by the fact that when America tried to expand, Mexico suppressed the Texans who settled, and America was not going to stand by and watch its own citizens get mistreated by foreign nations. With the spreading expansion of America’s territory in the early 19th century, it was inevitable that a war would eventually occur. As America’s land fever spread, in the mid-1800s Texas became a great place to settle. People established towns and houses to live in, but sooner or later the Mexican citizens would get frustrated with the Americans in their territory. The cultural differences, preferences, and other such things as languages and slavery perspectives were just too much. It would eventually get out of hand. Mexico began enforcing more harsh laws on the immigrants, and soon enough, Texas was declaring independence. However, Mexico considered this an act of aggression, and soon enough America had a war on its hands. This was mainly because of Manifest Destiny.
According to ‘The History of Mexico’ by Burton Corkwood, Greenwood Press,2000, the U.S.-Mexican War, “Following the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 and the doubling of U.S. territory, many Americans had looked at the region controlled first by Spain and, after 1821, by Mexico as a logical area for U.S. expansion. After the territory’s experimentation with independence, the United States annexed Texas in 1845.”
‘Manifest Destiny’ was the idea that the United States was supposed to expand across North America. This is one of the reasons America was justified to go along with the war: It’s the classic ‘This is MY land! GET OFF MY LAWN!’ kind of dispute. It lead to the Idea that expansion was a right, not a privilege. It took a lot of struggles, captives, and treaties to get it to work. Many attempts failed, such as the Treaties of Velasco, which both armies refused to accept. Thus, the treaties were broken, and the war continued.
According to the Texas State Library and Archive Commissions’ ‘The Treaties of Velasco’ “On May 26, General Vicente Filisola began withdrawing Mexican troops in fulfillment of the public treaty. However, the Texas army blocked Santa Anna’s release by the Texas government. Moreover, the Mexican government refused to accept the treaties on the grounds that Santa Anna had signed them as a captive. Since the treaties had now been violated by both sides, they never took effect. Mexico was not to recognize Texas independence until the U.S.-Mexican War was settled by the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848.”
Overall, Texas is famous for the Battle of the Alamo, which was one of the major points in the war. Although everybody in the Alamo died, America eventually won the War. One of many famous and brave people who fought in the U.S.-Mexican War is Davy Crockett. Heroes like him, who believed in the rights of freedom and expansion, fought hard and made America what it is today.

Your piece titled "Why the Mexican-American War was justified" presents a distinct viewpoint on the conflict. You've done a good job of linking the ideas of American expansion, the situation in Texas, and the concept of Manifest Destiny. To improve the clarity, coherence, and persuasiveness of your argument, here are several suggestions for revision:

Introductory Paragraph

1. Clear Thesis Statement: Begin with a thesis statement that explicitly outlines your argument. A more direct statement could set the stage for your claims clearly.

   Example: "The U.S.-Mexican War was justified as a necessary response to the oppressive actions of the Mexican government towards American settlers in Texas and a manifestation of the belief in Manifest Destiny, which held that Americans were destined to expand across North America."

Structure and Organization

2. Paragraph Breaks: Use paragraph breaks to separate distinct ideas. For example, create separate paragraphs for the introduction, the situation in Texas, the role of Manifest Destiny, the Treaties of Velasco, and the outcome of the war.

Clarity and Precision

3. Language and Tone: Some informal phrases, such as "This is MY land! GET OFF MY LAWN!" can undermine the seriousness of your argument. Consider rephrasing to maintain a more formal tone.

   Example: "This reflects a fundamental dispute over territorial rights and national sovereignty."

4. Avoiding Assumptions: Be careful to avoid broad assumptions. Rather than stating that "the cultural differences... were just too much," specify how those differences manifested in conflict.

Supporting Evidence

5. Citations and Sources: Make sure to cite sources properly and contextualize quotes more clearly. Integrate quotes and evidence smoothly into your narrative to strengthen your argument.

   Example: "Burton Corkwood notes in The History of Mexico that after the Louisiana Purchase, many Americans viewed the territory controlled by Mexico as a logical area for expansion, leading to the annexation of Texas in 1845."

Conclusions and Reflection

6. Summarize Main Points: In your conclusion, reiterate the main arguments you've made and reflect on their significance in the larger context of U.S. history.

   Example: "By recognizing the oppressive nature of Mexican governance over American settlers and the cultural tensions that prompted conflict, we see the U.S.-Mexican War as not only a pivotal moment in American history but also a manifestation of the broader principles of liberty and expansion that define the nation."

Revised Sample Excerpt:

---

The U.S.-Mexican War was justified as a necessary response to the oppressive actions of the Mexican government towards American settlers in Texas and a manifestation of the belief in Manifest Destiny, which held that Americans were destined to expand across North America. By the mid-19th century, the influx of settlers into Texas led to significant cultural clashes, including differing views on governance and slavery. As these tensions escalated, Mexico began enforcing stricter regulations on settlers, which many Americans viewed as an infringement on their rights. This context of oppression and conflict laid the groundwork for a struggle that many Americans believed was not only inevitable but justified. Corkwood emphasizes that "following the Louisiana Purchase, many Americans looked at the region controlled... by Mexico as a logical area for U.S. expansion," ultimately leading to the annexation of Texas in 1845. This belief in Manifest Destiny galvanized support for the war among Americans who felt that expansion was not merely a desire but a right inherent to the nation.

---

By following these suggestions, you will create a more focused, persuasive, and scholarly argument regarding the justification of the U.S.-Mexican War.

you saying my essay aint strong enough as it is already?

Not at all! Your essay has a solid foundation, and you present clear arguments regarding the justification of the U.S.-Mexican War. My suggestions are intended to enhance clarity, strengthen your argument, and improve the overall flow and structure, but they don't imply that your essay lacks strength.

Strengthening an argument is a common practice in writing; even experienced writers often revise their work to make it clearer and more compelling. With some adjustments, your essay has the potential to be even more persuasive and effective. If you feel confident in what you've written, you're certainly on the right track! If you have specific aspects of the essay you'd like feedback on or areas you're concerned about, feel free to share, and I’d be glad to help further.