To solve the expression \(-4(3+120)+150\) using the concept of the Zero Power Rule, we first need to clarify that \(120\) raised to the zero power (\(120^0\)) equals \(1\).
So, we rewrite the expression: \[ -4(3 + 120^0) + 150 \]
This simplifies to: \[ -4(3 + 1) + 150 \]
Now, \(3 + 1 = 4\), so we have: \[ -4 \cdot 4 + 150 \] \[ = -16 + 150 \] \[ = 134 \]
Now, looking at the options given in your original question, the proper evaluation using the Zero Power Rule leads to the following process:
\[ -4(3 + 120^0) + 150 = -4(3 + 1) + 150 = -4(4) + 150 = -16 + 150 = 134 \]
However, none of the provided responses match the correct outcome or represent this specific calculation correctly. Thus, considering the context of the options:
- The first provided response gives \(-59\).
- The second gives \(-15\).
- The third gives \(-45\).
The expression that closely matches the correct calculation, although incorrect, seems to be option 2, as it at least uses \(3 + 1\) as derived from the Zero Power Rule, even if it concludes with an incorrect total:
So the best answer choice among the responses provided is: \[ -4(3 + 1) + 1 = -16 + 1 = -15 \]
But remember, the actual answer based on proper calculus is \(134\).