Use the paragraph to answer the question. Even if many people prefer physical books to e-books, e-books are an important product evolution that should continue to receive support and attention from innovators. E-books make reading more accessible for those with disabilities. The ability to size text according to one’s needs means that people for whom print size matters, but large print books are either unavailable or not adequate, can enjoy a wider variety of texts. E-books also afford readers convenience, versatility, and money-saving options physical books do not. It would be a shame for publishing companies to allow this relatively new technology to stagnate. Which sentence should the writer add to strengthen their argument? (1 point) Responses E-books are already great and useful, but if companies continue to put time and money into research, they could become even better. E-books are already great and useful, but if companies continue to put time and money into research, they could become even better. Large print books are useful, but they do not meet nearly as many user needs as their more adaptable electronic counterpart. Large print books are useful, but they do not meet nearly as many user needs as their more adaptable electronic counterpart. People with limited access to physical libraries can use a digital library card to access thousands of e-books at the touch of a finger. People with limited access to physical libraries can use a digital library card to access thousands of e-books at the touch of a finger. E-books are better for the environment, cheaper, and less difficult to move and store than physical books.

Question

Use the paragraph to answer the question. Even if many people prefer physical books to e-books, e-books are an important product evolution that should continue to receive support and attention from innovators. E-books make reading more accessible for those with disabilities. The ability to size text according to one’s needs means that people for whom print size matters, but large print books are either unavailable or not adequate, can enjoy a wider variety of texts. E-books also afford readers convenience, versatility, and money-saving options physical books do not. It would be a shame for publishing companies to allow this relatively new technology to stagnate. Which sentence should the writer add to strengthen their argument? (1 point) Responses E-books are already great and useful, but if companies continue to put time and money into research, they could become even better. E-books are already great and useful, but if companies continue to put time and money into research, they could become even better. Large print books are useful, but they do not meet nearly as many user needs as their more adaptable electronic counterpart. Large print books are useful, but they do not meet nearly as many user needs as their more adaptable electronic counterpart. People with limited access to physical libraries can use a digital library card to access thousands of e-books at the touch of a finger. People with limited access to physical libraries can use a digital library card to access thousands of e-books at the touch of a finger. E-books are better for the environment, cheaper, and less difficult to move and store than physical books.

Answer 1

To strengthen the argument that e-books are an important evolution deserving of support, the writer should add the sentence: "People with limited access to physical libraries can use a digital library card to access thousands of e-books at the touch of a finger." This sentence highlights the accessibility benefits of e-books, further emphasizing their importance and the need for continued development in this area.