"To write a persuasive argument, you should consider claims that contradict your own claim. By considering opposing claims, you can strengthen your own argument."

Question

How should an author effectively address opposing claims in writing?
with more facts
with defensive claims
with a counterargument
with opinions

Answer 1

An author should effectively address opposing claims in writing with a counterargument. This approach involves acknowledging the opposing viewpoint and then providing evidence and reasoning that undermine or refute that viewpoint, thereby reinforcing the author's own claim.

While incorporating more facts can support the argument, simply relying on facts alone may not effectively address opposing claims. Defensive claims might come off as overly reactive rather than persuasive. Lastly, relying on opinions can weaken the argument since they are subjective and may not provide solid support against opposing claims. A well-structured counterargument demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the topic and enhances the overall persuasiveness of the argument.

Answer 2

"Critical thinkers do not take written words as true without considering alternative points of view."
What is an alternative point of view in an argumentative essay?
significant claim
supportable claim
persuasive language
counterargument

Answer 3

In an argumentative essay, an alternative point of view is referred to as a counterargument. A counterargument presents an opposing perspective or claim that contrasts with the main argument of the essay. Addressing counterarguments is essential for critical thinking and strengthens the overall argument by demonstrating that the author has considered multiple sides of the issue before arriving at their conclusion.

Answer 4

What will improve your counterargument?
defending opposing claims
analyzing opposing claims
summarizing opposing claims
organizing opposing claims

Answer 5

To improve your counterargument, you should focus on analyzing opposing claims. This involves critically examining the strengths and weaknesses of those claims and providing thoughtful insights into why they may be flawed or less convincing than your own argument.

While defending opposing claims can be useful for understanding them, it does not directly strengthen your counterargument. Summarizing opposing claims can provide context but does not necessarily improve the depth or effectiveness of your counterargument. Organizing opposing claims is helpful for clarity, but it's the analysis that adds depth and persuasive power to your argument.

Answer 6

What is the best way for an author to address an opposing claim?
by providing a counterargument to address it
by ignoring it
by explaining why it is false
by including evidence that supports it

Answer 7

The best way for an author to address an opposing claim is by providing a counterargument to address it. This approach involves acknowledging the opposing perspective and then presenting a reasoned response that challenges or refutes that viewpoint, ideally supported by evidence and logical reasoning.

Ignoring the opposing claim can weaken the author's argument, as it may appear they are avoiding important aspects of the discussion. Explaining why it is false can also be effective but is often most convincing when framed within the context of a counterargument. Including evidence that supports it would be counterproductive, as it would undermine the original position the author is advocating. Thus, providing a counterargument is the most comprehensive and effective way to engage with opposing claims.

Answer 8

"Claim: Bird feeders are a kind way to help the birds in the community.
Opposing claim: Bird feeders make it easy for outdoor cats to prey on birds."
Which statement is a good counterargument to the opposing claim?
Bird feeders that hang from trees protect birds from predators.
Most cats chase squirrels instead of birds.
Birds don't feed when cats are around.
Most cat owners keep their pets inside.

Answer 9

A good counterargument to the opposing claim would be: Bird feeders that hang from trees protect birds from predators.

This statement directly addresses the concern that bird feeders make it easier for outdoor cats to prey on birds by suggesting a specific solution that mitigates the risk to birds. It provides a clear rationale for why bird feeders can still be beneficial even in the presence of cats.

The other options do touch on related aspects but do not effectively counter the specific concern posed by the opposing claim. For example, saying that "most cats chase squirrels instead of birds" doesn't directly address the threat posed by cats to birds at feeders. Similarly, pointing out that "birds don't feed when cats are around" reinforces the opposing claim rather than counteracting it. Lastly, stating that "most cat owners keep their pets inside" doesn't necessarily relate to the argument about outdoor cats and bird feeders.