A student is writing a persuasive paper trying to convince the local city council to increase the number of bike lanes. Which reason would be the most important argument to include in the paper?

The most important argument to include in the persuasive paper would be:

"People in our town bike often but have no safe place on the road."

This reason directly addresses the need for bike lanes from a safety perspective, highlighting that there is already a demand for biking in the community. It emphasizes the importance of providing safe infrastructure to protect cyclists, which is a key consideration for city council members when evaluating community needs and public safety.

Yes, I am sure. The reason, "People in our town bike often but have no safe place on the road," is particularly compelling because it highlights both the current behavior of residents (biking often) and the critical issue of safety. This argument presents a clear need for change, which is essential for persuading the city council to take action. By focusing on safety, the argument can appeal to public health concerns, community well-being, and the desire to promote cycling as a sustainable form of transportation.

While the other reasons have merit, they don't address the urgent need for safe biking conditions as directly. Providing a safe environment for cyclists is likely to resonate more with decision-makers focused on the health and safety of the community.