Read the two statements from the different articles below:
Original article: At Thomas Edison High School in Queens, a new solar installation generates electricity. In fact, it produces enough electricity to meet 65 percent of the school's energy consumption.
Second article: The solar installation project at Thomas Edison High School in Queens isn't as effective as it could be. In fact, 35 percent of the school's energy consumption isn't supported by the solar panels at all.
What is the key difference in how the two texts interpret the facts differently?
(1 point)
Responses
The second article has a less favorable explanation of how solar energy is benefitting the school system
The second article has a less favorable explanation of how solar energy is benefitting the school system
The second article is more objective.
The second article is more objective.
The original article uses more emotional language to explain the impact of solar energy.
The original article uses more emotional language to explain the impact of solar energy.
The original article has a less favorable explanation of how solar energy is benefitting the school system
1 answer
The key difference in how the two texts interpret the facts differently is:
The second article has a less favorable explanation of how solar energy is benefitting the school system.
The original article focuses on the positive aspect of the solar installation meeting 65 percent of the school's energy needs, while the second article highlights the negative aspect that 35 percent of the consumption is not covered by the solar panels.
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
5 answers