The author's purpose in writing this text appears to be twofold: to inform the audience about the recent legislative actions regarding the serving of potatoes in schools and to present the differing viewpoints surrounding these actions.
-
Informative Purpose: The author aims to provide the reader with an overview of the U.S. Senate's decision to block a USDA proposal aimed at limiting the servings of potatoes in school lunches. The text includes details about the amendment process, the stakeholders involved, and the potential implications on school lunch programs, thereby effectively informing the audience of recent developments and the context surrounding the issue.
-
Presenting Multiple Perspectives: The author also emphasizes the differing viewpoints regarding the proposal. This is evidenced by including quotes from political figures, such as Senator Susan Collins and Senator Mark Udall, who advocate for the amendment, alongside the perspectives of organizations like the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which supported the limits on potatoes. By capturing these varying opinions, the author seeks to present a balanced view of the debate over nutrition, school food policy, and the interests of potato growers, thereby engaging readers to consider the complexities of food regulation in schools.
Overall, the writing style is straightforward and neutral, focusing on factual reporting while allowing different voices to emerge within the discussion.