Which kind of flawed reasoning is this?

Question

(1 point)
Responses

gambler’s fallacy
gambler’s fallacy

appeal to emotion
appeal to emotion

appeal to authority
appeal to authority

false dichotomy

Answer 1

The flawed reasoning described in your question could be identified as "gambler’s fallacy." This fallacy occurs when someone believes that past random events can influence future random events, especially in gambling scenarios. For example, if a coin has landed on heads five times in a row, someone might incorrectly believe that tails is "due" to happen, which is a misunderstanding of probability.

If you have a specific argument or scenario in mind, I can help clarify further which fallacy it best fits if you provide more details.

Answer 2

What is one difference between the two passages?

(1 point)
Responses

King believes some tension is necessary, while Lincoln calls for unity.
King believes some tension is necessary, while Lincoln calls for unity.

Lincoln believes some tension is necessary, while King calls for unity.
Lincoln believes some tension is necessary, while King calls for unity.

Lincoln responds to his critics, while King lists the concerns he has for unifying the country.
Lincoln responds to his critics, while King lists the concerns he has for unifying the country.

King’s tone is formal while Lincoln’s is more conversational.
King’s tone is formal while Lincoln’s is more conversational.

Answer 3

Without seeing the actual passages in question, it is difficult to determine which specific difference is correct. However, I can provide some insights based on common characteristics of the works of Martin Luther King Jr. and Abraham Lincoln.

1. Tension vs. Unity: This often aligns with King's perspective on the necessity of some degree of tension to bring about justice, while Lincoln often emphasized unity in preserving the nation during a time of division.

2. Response to Critics vs. Listing Concerns: Lincoln typically addressed his critics directly in his speeches and letters, while King often articulated broader concerns related to civil rights and social justice.

3. Tone: King’s tone is often more formal and poetic, reflecting his background as a preacher and activist, while Lincoln's tone can vary but often includes a more conversational and relatable approach, especially in speeches addressing common citizens.

If you provide the specific passages or a bit more context, I can help pinpoint which of these options best describes the key difference between them.

Answer 4

The Bill of Rights uses different techniques than Wilberforce’s speech to convey its point. What techniques are unique to the Bill of Rights?

(1 point)
Responses

appealing to the readers’ emotions
appealing to the readers’ emotions

using lists to organize the document
using lists to organize the document

employing figurative language
employing figurative language

drawing attention to injustice
drawing attention to injustice

Answer 5

The technique that is unique to the Bill of Rights is using lists to organize the document. The Bill of Rights is structured as a list of amendments, each outlining specific rights and protections afforded to individuals. This organized format distinguishes it from speeches like Wilberforce's, which may use emotional appeals, figurative language, or draw attention to injustice but do not typically employ the structured list format seen in legal documents like the Bill of Rights.

Answer 6

In 3–5 sentences, make an inference based on the two texts. Include an explanation about how the two articles work together to support your inference.

Answer 7

Based on the contrasting approaches of the Bill of Rights and Wilberforce’s speech, one can infer that both documents emphasize the importance of individual rights and social justice, albeit through different methods. The Bill of Rights provides a systematic outline of specific legal protections, reflecting a foundational approach to safeguarding liberties in a constitutional framework. In contrast, Wilberforce’s passionate oratory focuses on moral appeals to inspire social change and address injustices, particularly regarding slavery. Together, these texts illustrate how formal legal protections and impassioned advocacy complement each other in the broader fight for human rights, highlighting that legal frameworks alone are often insufficient without active moral and social engagement.

Answer 8

In 3–5 sentences, analyze how the author used rhetoric to advance their point of view. Include a statement explaining the author’s purpose.

Answer 9

The author employs powerful emotional appeals and vivid imagery to advance their point of view, aiming to evoke a strong emotional response from the audience. By using rhetorical devices such as metaphors and repetition, the author emphasizes the urgency of the issue at hand and the moral imperative for change. For instance, they might illustrate the suffering caused by injustice in stark, relatable terms to compel the audience to feel a sense of empathy and responsibility. The author’s purpose is to persuade readers to recognize the importance of taking action against social injustices, thereby galvanizing support for their cause and advocating for reform. Through this strategic use of rhetoric, the author not only articulates a clear stance but also seeks to foster a connection with the audience that transforms awareness into action.

Answer 10

The Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr.

In 3–5 sentences, explain how the speaker’s word choice and the relationships among words in the paragraph beginning with “My friends, I must say to you …” and ending with “... cup of coffee at a lunch counter.” produce a specific tone.

Answer 11

In the paragraph beginning with "My friends, I must say to you …" and ending with "... cup of coffee at a lunch counter," the speaker's word choice conveys a tone of urgency and determination. Phrases like "I must say" suggest a pressing need to communicate important truths, while the use of "friends" establishes a sense of camaraderie and solidarity with the audience. The vivid imagery of sitting at a lunch counter highlights the simple yet profound desire for equality and basic human dignity, evoking both empathy and a moral imperative. Together, this deliberate language and relational dynamics create a tone that is both motivational and reflective, urging listeners to recognize the significance of their struggle for civil rights.