To determine whether the mean or median is the best measure of center for a data set, we need to consider the shape of the distribution of the data.
- If the data is normally distributed (symmetric), the mean and median will be similar, and either could serve as an appropriate measure of center.
- If the data is skewed (either to the left or right), the median is generally a better measure because it is less affected by outliers.
If the number of goals scored by the soccer team varies significantly (e.g., most teams score few goals, but a couple score a lot), this would produce a skewed distribution.
Assuming that the distribution is skewed, we would likely prefer the median as it would better represent the central tendency of the data set.
Without additional context about the shape of the data distribution, it's difficult to make a definitive statement, but if the choice includes "The median value of 2.6 is the best measure of center that describes the shape of the data set." this would typically be a reasonable response if we suspect skewness.
If the distribution of goals is heavily concentrated on a certain range (like most teams scoring 0-2, but a few scoring much higher), then the median gives a better sense of the "typical" performance.
Thus, a suitable answer might be:
The median value of 2.6 is the best measure of center that describes the shape of the data set.