The correct response to describe why the expression "01n + 235 92U" is incorrect is:
A neutron should be expressed as 10n, not 01n.
In nuclear notation, the neutron is represented as \( ^1_0n \) or \( ^0_1n \), but it is more commonly represented simply as \( n \) or \( ^1n \) without any atomic number for clarity since it has no charge and a mass number of 1. The notation "01n" is not standard.
Additionally, while the mass number and atomic number for uranium-235 should be in the correct format, the specific expression for the neutron is the primary issue in the given expression.