To find the scale factor used by Kamla to create the second parallelogram from the first parallelogram, you need to compare the corresponding sides of the two shapes.
-
First Parallelogram:
- One parallel side: 5 inches
- Adjacent side: 3.5 inches
-
Second Parallelogram:
- One parallel side: 0.7 inches
- Adjacent vertical side: 1 inch
Now, we calculate the scale factor for both sides:
-
For the first parallel side:
\[ \text{Scale Factor} = \frac{\text{Length of second parallelogram}}{\text{Length of first parallelogram}} = \frac{0.7}{5} = 0.14 \]
-
For the adjacent side:
\[ \text{Scale Factor} = \frac{1}{3.5} \approx 0.2857 \]
Since the scale factors are not consistent between the two sides, we need to check which of the given responses is consistent or could be a common scale factor.
The scale factor is not directly given in the problem, but if we were to use standard measurements:
Let's approximate those to see which matches our corresponding options:
- Approximate repetition with 0.2 for one of the sides is closer to the original length,
- The other associations do not equate multiplicatively in a linear scale in this classification either.
However, 0.2 would be the best logical option for general scaling based on the inputs if it represents the repetitive use for the average scaling factor significant throughout transformations.
So, the answer is likely 0.2 based on reasonable scaling comparisons, even if a strict dimensional alignment isn't present.