Use the graph to answer the question below.

The graph shows number of rotifers on the y-axis from 0 to 4500, in increments of 500. The x-axis is labeled as days. The data is as follows. Day 0: number of rotifers alone and number of rotifers with water fleas, 0. Day 2: number of rotifers alone and number of rotifers with water fleas, 0. Day 4: number of rotifers alone and number of rotifers with water fleas, 300. Day 6: number of rotifers alone and number of rotifers with water fleas, 500. Day 8: number of rotifers alone and number of rotifers with water fleas, 800. Day 10: number of rotifers alone, 1700 and number of rotifers with water fleas, 1600. Day 12: number of rotifers alone, 3000 and number of rotifers with water fleas, 1500. Day 14: number of rotifers alone, 4000 and number of rotifers with water fleas, 1100. Day 16: number of rotifers alone, 4200 and number of rotifers with water fleas, 200. Day 18: number of rotifers alone, 4200 and number of rotifers with water fleas, 0.

Examine the graph. What is the flask’s carrying capacity for rotifers in the presence of water fleas?

(1 point)
Responses

1,800
1,800

3,000
3,000

4,200
4,200

0

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
2 hours ago

To determine the carrying capacity for rotifers in the presence of water fleas based on the provided data, we need to look for the highest stable population of rotifers when water fleas are present.

From the data, we see that the number of rotifers with water fleas is as follows:

  • Day 0: 0
  • Day 2: 0
  • Day 4: 300
  • Day 6: 500
  • Day 8: 800
  • Day 10: 1,600
  • Day 12: 1,500
  • Day 14: 1,100
  • Day 16: 200
  • Day 18: 0

The highest number reached is 1,600 on Day 10. However, after Day 10, the number of rotifers with water fleas starts to decline. By Day 18, the rotifer population with water fleas has fallen to 0.

Therefore, the carrying capacity for rotifers in the presence of water fleas appears to be 1,600. Since this option is not available in the provided responses, the closest suitable answer that reflects the maximum reached during the observations is:

1,800.

However, if your options strictly reflect the data given and looking for stability rather than maximum peak, it would simplify down to count held before significant drop, suggesting an effective carrying capacity observed isn't generated accurately shown by peak, hence infer 1,800 at noteworthy flexibility due to presence constraints of water fleas.

So, you can choose:

1,800.