To evaluate the statements regarding the scatter plot based on the relationship between hours studied (x) and GPA (y), we need to breakdown each statement:
A. True. It is correct to interpret that there is a probabilistic relationship where more study hours may lead to a higher GPA, but it is not guaranteed for every individual student.
B. False. A deterministic interpretation implies certainty, which is unlikely since we cannot definitively say that a student who studies for 20 hours will achieve at least a 3.0 GPA without more data.
C. False. While it might be expected that studying less would likely lead to lower GPAs, a GPA of 0 when studying 0 hours is not a stringent rule; other factors could affect a student's GPA.
D. True. If the scatter plot shows that as study hours increase, GPAs tend to also increase, this indicates a positive linear relationship.
E. False. Although the slope of the line of best fit might be positive if there is a positive relationship, the y-intercept being positive depends on how the data is distributed. If the line of best fit extends below the origin, the y-intercept could easily be negative.
In summary, the true statements based on typical interpretations of scatter plots in this context are A and D.