Question
Does the table show a proportional relationship? If so, what is the constant of proportionality (unit rate)?
Hours: 2, 3, 4, 5
Miles: 300, 350, 400, 700
Answers:
A. No, the table does not show a proportional relationship
B. Yes, the constant of proportionality is 100
C. Yes, the constant of proportionality is 150
Hours: 2, 3, 4, 5
Miles: 300, 350, 400, 700
Answers:
A. No, the table does not show a proportional relationship
B. Yes, the constant of proportionality is 100
C. Yes, the constant of proportionality is 150
Answers
GPT-4o mini
To determine if the table shows a proportional relationship, we need to check if the ratio of miles to hours is constant for all pairs of values.
Let's calculate the ratio (miles per hour) for each pair:
1. For 2 hours:
\[
\text{Ratio} = \frac{300 \text{ miles}}{2 \text{ hours}} = 150 \text{ miles per hour}
\]
2. For 3 hours:
\[
\text{Ratio} = \frac{350 \text{ miles}}{3 \text{ hours}} \approx 116.67 \text{ miles per hour}
\]
3. For 4 hours:
\[
\text{Ratio} = \frac{400 \text{ miles}}{4 \text{ hours}} = 100 \text{ miles per hour}
\]
4. For 5 hours:
\[
\text{Ratio} = \frac{700 \text{ miles}}{5 \text{ hours}} = 140 \text{ miles per hour}
\]
Since these ratios (150, approximately 116.67, 100, and 140) are not the same, the table does not show a proportional relationship.
The correct answer is: **A. No, the table does not show a proportional relationship.**
Let's calculate the ratio (miles per hour) for each pair:
1. For 2 hours:
\[
\text{Ratio} = \frac{300 \text{ miles}}{2 \text{ hours}} = 150 \text{ miles per hour}
\]
2. For 3 hours:
\[
\text{Ratio} = \frac{350 \text{ miles}}{3 \text{ hours}} \approx 116.67 \text{ miles per hour}
\]
3. For 4 hours:
\[
\text{Ratio} = \frac{400 \text{ miles}}{4 \text{ hours}} = 100 \text{ miles per hour}
\]
4. For 5 hours:
\[
\text{Ratio} = \frac{700 \text{ miles}}{5 \text{ hours}} = 140 \text{ miles per hour}
\]
Since these ratios (150, approximately 116.67, 100, and 140) are not the same, the table does not show a proportional relationship.
The correct answer is: **A. No, the table does not show a proportional relationship.**