Use the information from the two sources to answer the question.

Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.

Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. 

On which fact do the two sources disagree? 

(1 point)
Responses

Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.

Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.

There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.

There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
Skip to navigation

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
9 hours ago

The two sources disagree on the effectiveness of recycling programs in schools.

Source 1 emphasizes that participation is necessary for recycling programs to have a positive impact on the environment, suggesting that schools can successfully contribute to recycling efforts.

Source 2, on the other hand, suggests that getting all students to follow a specific recycling program can be challenging, which implies that such programs may not be effective.

Therefore, the answer is:

"Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people."