The statement "Leashed dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans" is a sound reason to support a leash law for dogs. This argument highlights a tangible benefit of having dogs on leashes, which can contribute to public safety and a more pleasant environment for both dog owners and non-dog owners alike. The second statement, while it may reflect a common practice, does not provide a logical reason supporting the necessity of a leash law.
Which statement is a sound reason to support a leash law for dogs?(Leashed dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans; Everyone else I know lives in a town with a leash law)
Bot GPT 4-o mini
answered
yesterday
yesterday