Question
Which statement best explains why one text is more believable than the other?
(1 point)
Responses
Text 2 is more believable because it demonstrates the frustration people felt regarding the pothole.
Text 2 is more believable because it demonstrates the frustration people felt regarding the pothole.
Text 2 is more believable because it shows both sides of the issue before it makes a claim.
Text 2 is more believable because it shows both sides of the issue before it makes a claim.
Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events.
Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events.
Text 1 is more believable because it comes to the correct conclusion about what should have happened.
(1 point)
Responses
Text 2 is more believable because it demonstrates the frustration people felt regarding the pothole.
Text 2 is more believable because it demonstrates the frustration people felt regarding the pothole.
Text 2 is more believable because it shows both sides of the issue before it makes a claim.
Text 2 is more believable because it shows both sides of the issue before it makes a claim.
Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events.
Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events.
Text 1 is more believable because it comes to the correct conclusion about what should have happened.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The statement that best explains why one text is more believable than the other is:
**Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events.**
This explanation suggests that the reasoning and evaluation presented in Text 1 enhance its credibility by providing a structured argument based on events, which is often a hallmark of a believable and well-supported text.
**Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events.**
This explanation suggests that the reasoning and evaluation presented in Text 1 enhance its credibility by providing a structured argument based on events, which is often a hallmark of a believable and well-supported text.