While all the options presented could contribute to addressing Venezuela's oil pollution issue to some extent, the most likely option to tackle the root causes effectively would be a democratically elected government. A democratically elected government is more likely to prioritize environmental policies, have accountability to its citizens, and implement sustainable practices. Additionally, it may attract international support and investment, leading to improvements in the oil industry and better environmental regulations.
Which would be most likely to solve Venezuela’s problem with oil pollution?
(1 point)
Responses
a more effective government
a more effective government
foreign investment in its oil industry
foreign investment in its oil industry
better pay for its oil workers
better pay for its oil workers
a democratically elected government
13 hours ago
13 hours ago
13 hours ago
If we are to choose a different option, foreign investment in its oil industry could be the most likely to help solve Venezuela's problem with oil pollution. Foreign investment often comes with advanced technology, expertise in environmental management, and stricter regulatory practices that may help improve environmental standards and reduce pollution in oil extraction and production processes.
13 hours ago
13 hours ago
One negative aspect of Brazil’s government in the second half of the 1900s was the period of military dictatorship that lasted from 1964 to 1985. During this time, the government implemented repressive measures, including censorship of the media, suppression of political opposition, human rights abuses, and a lack of democratic freedoms. This authoritarian regime stifled dissent and led to significant social and political unrest, affecting civil liberties and political rights in the country.
13 hours ago
13 hours ago
One negative aspect of Brazil’s government in the second half of the 1900s was the military dictatorship from 1964 to 1985, which involved repression of political dissent, censorship, human rights abuses, and the suppression of democratic freedoms.
13 hours ago
13 hours ago
Countries with higher literacy rates tend to have better economic development, improved health outcomes, and higher levels of civic participation. Literacy often correlates with access to education and resources, leading to a more skilled workforce, increased productivity, and a greater capacity for individuals to engage in their communities and participate in the democratic process. Additionally, higher literacy rates can lead to better decision-making in health, financial, and social matters, contributing to overall societal well-being.
13 hours ago
(1 point)
Responses
Chainsaws release gases that heat the atmosphere.
Chainsaws release gases that heat the atmosphere.
Cleared land gives off more carbon than forests.
Cleared land gives off more carbon than forests.
When trees are cut down, carbon stored in them is released.
When trees are cut down, carbon stored in them is released.
More timber fuels industry, causing warmer temperatures.
13 hours ago
The correct response is: When trees are cut down, carbon stored in them is released.
Deforestation contributes to climate change because trees absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store carbon. When they are cut down, the carbon stored in their biomass is released back into the atmosphere, increasing greenhouse gas concentrations and contributing to global warming.